Vengeancia “”Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law, is action taken ‘under color of’ state law.” Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)
There’s no doubt that a majority of attorneys, judges, and their kind are running roughshod all over We the People in today’s courtrooms. The role of a BAR-certified CIVIL rights attorney is to maintain the status quo whereby the Elite’s rights, as owners and shareholders of the corp. dba the US of A, are superior to We, the People’s Rights. Read more about Attorneys. Read more about the Fascist false left/right paradigm.
In the following blurbs and discussion, keep in mind that, any so-called civil rights, really privileges, granted by the Elite to an abstracted legal person must be consented to by the real, living, freeman or woman (FOTL). Check out more at Freedom School.
When it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach the merits. In such a situation the action should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026, 1030]
“However late this objection has been made, or may be made in any cause, in an inferior or appellate court of the United States, it must be considered and decided, before any court can move one further step in the cause; as any movement is necessarily the exercise of jurisdiction.” Rhode Island v. Massachussetts, 37 U.S. 657, 718, 9 L.Ed. 1233 (1838)
“It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.” Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 404, 5 L.Ed. 257, 6 Wheat. 264 (1821)
Where there is no jurisdiction over the subject matter, there is, as well, no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction. [John J. Joyce v. United States of America, 474 F.2d 215, 219] Joyce v. U.S., 474 F.2d 215, 219 (C.A.3 (Pa.), 1973)
Check out Genesis 1) Are you living or dead? 2) Are you in the lineage of Adam or the cattle? 3) Are you the one naming, or are you the one being named?
Moreover, the difference between lawful and legal, in my opinion, is this: lawful is what the real people sitting around the Monopoly Board are doing, and legal is what their tokens on the board are doing. As everyone knows, there is a complex interaction between the real people playing the game and the tokens that “represent” them on the board. Read Globalists Plan to Downsize Americans into Jail Cells.
The Elite are moving up the steps of this pyramid on the dollar bill – their tower of Babel, their ladder to heaven – on their journey to eternal life and enlightenment along the road to their New World Order. Unfortunately, in the process, they are stepping over the dead bodies of we, the people, just like Barry Jennings stepped on dead bodies as he evacuated WTC #7 on 9/11!
Be sure to check out Alfred Adask. He discusses this topic quite a bit. People are being dehumanized. Apparently, by our own consent. Mostly, because we are being kept in the dark about how these games are played. Read The Truth About Trusts.
I’m interested in the idea that a sovereign man or woman on the Land (FOTL) may be operating pursuant to FOREIGN LAW…the Constitution. Why? First, the people on the land are ontologically FOREIGN to the corporation, which is a legal fiction. The people are LIVING and the fictions are DEAD. Moreover, can the creation be greater than its creator? Of course not! The real question is, are we creators or are we creations? Or are we both?
The Bible is Public Law, meaning that it is recognized as part of the legal “law” of the corporation dba the US of A:
Regardless of individual belief systems, in the Constitutional Republic known as, The United States of America, the Bible is Foundational Law. Public Law 97-280 (1982) states, “The Bible is the word of God.” More.
“And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.” Genesis 3:20. In the video below, Victor discusses the problem. I don’t agree with his solution, necessarily, but it’s great background info.
Genesis 2:19-20 “And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field…”
Further, are men and women in America and around the planet merely ANIMALS? According to Noah Webster, ”The whole human race are the posterity of Adam.” So, apparently not. The Bible differentiates between Adam and the animals.
Therefore, we conclude the answers to these three questions are thus: 1) Yes, you are living, 2) Yes, you are in the lineage of Adam, not the Cattle, and therefore, 3) Yes, you are the one naming, not the one being named.
The American people are innocent until proven guilty in a court of LAW. Unfortunately, the corp. dba the US of A, attorneys, judges, police, etc., act toward us as if we are guilty, and require us to prove our innocence. This is bass-ackward!!! Americans have truly gone through the looking glass.
Some of these topics re: foreign law may be addressed here, Demystifying the Determination of Foreign Law in U.S. Courts: Opening the Door to a Greater Global Understanding:
“U.S. federal courts have long had the authority to resolve disputes that require the application of substantive foreign law. If state conflict-of-laws rules require the application of foreign law, then the federal courts must apply it…”
CIVIL STATE. The union of individual men in civil society under a system of laws and a magistracy, or magistracies, charged with the administration of the laws. It is a fundamental law of the civil state, that no member of it shall undertake to redress or avenge any violation of his rights, by another person, but appeal to the constituted authorities for that purpose, in all cases in which it is possible for him to do so. Hence the citizens are justly considered as being under the safeguard of the law. 1 Toull. n. 201. Vide Self-defence.
Who and what are the “constituted authorities” in America? Furthermore, how do I get out from under the “safeguard of the law?” Even more pressing, how do I make use of the “constituted authorities” and “safeguard of the law” in order to benefit myself, a living woman on the land, rather than to benefit the usurous banksters and Elite?
Here are my recent thoughts on this topic: read Stating Your Claim. You may want to check out:
42 USC § 1985 – Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;
(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws;
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.
28 USC § 1343 – Civil rights and elective franchise
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person:
(1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42;
(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States;
(4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.
(b) For purposes of this section—
(1) the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a State; and
(2) any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
The above was taken from Civil Rights at the US Code.
“Civil rights” is a little like “sovereign citizen.” The phrase is an oxymoron. It more accurately would read civil PRIVILEGES. Civil privileges apply to PERSONS, non-living subjects, vessels, tokens, of the CIVIL STATE. Unalienable Rights apply to the FREE PEOPLE on the land (FOTL). You may want to read these definitions from Bouvier’s Dictionary re: the term, “civil.” It’s enlightening!
Picture a Monopoly Board. The man or woman moving the token around has unalienable rights, which means that the man or woman can play or not play, at will. The man or woman CONSENTS to play the game and BE the pawn, by his consent. The token has civil privileges, which are comparable to the rules of the game. People deal with one another, off-board, lawfully, but while they are RE-presenting themselves in the game, their tokens behave legally on the Monopoly Board. It’s like having a membership in a Fitness Club….
Perhaps justice lies somewhere over the rainbow….
If you want to choose to NOT consent to play in the legal game, to be a Freeman on the Land (FOTL), one who ordains the Constitution, you may want to check out Get Out and Stay Out of Jail. Also, here are some sample documents useful in a Suit at Common Law should you decide to approach the courts pursuant to the 7th Amendment. WARNING! There are no Constitutional courts in America except for perhaps the County Clerk and Recorders office. Our challenge is to get the republic back!
CIVIL DEATH, persons. The change of the state (q. v.) of a person who is declared civilly dead by judgment of a competent tribunal. In such case, the person against whom such sentence is pronounced is considered dead. 2 John. R. 218. See Gilb. Uses, 150; 2 Bulst. 188; Co. tit. 132; Jenk. Cent. 250; 1 Keble, 398; Prest. on Convey. 140. Vide Death, civil.
CIVIL LAW. The municipal code of the Romans is so called. It is a rule of action, adopted by mankind in a state of society. It denotes also the municipal law of the land. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 11. See Law, civil.
CIVIL LIST. The sum which is yearly paid by the state to its monarch, and the domains of which he is suffered to have the enjoyment.
CIVIL OBLIGATION, Civil law. One which binds in law, vinculum juris, and which may be enforced in a court of justice. Poth. Obl. 173, and 191. See Obligation.
CIVIL OFFICER. The constitution of the United States, art. 2, s. 4, provides, that the president, vice-president, and civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. By this term are included all officers of the United States who hold their appointments under the national government, whether their duties are executive or judicial, in the highest or the lowest departments; of the government, with the exception of officers of the army and navy. Rawle on the Const. 213; 2 Story, Const. 790; a senator of the United States, it was decided, was not a civil officer, within the meaning of this clause in the constitution. Senate Journals, 10th January, 1799; 4 Tuck. Bl. Com. Appx. 57, 58; Rawle, Const. 213; Serg. on Const. Law, 376; Story, Const. 791.
CIVIL REMEDY, practice. This term is used in opposition to the remedy given by indictment in a criminal case, and signifies the remedy which the law gives to the party against the offender.
2. In cases of treason and felony, the law,, for wise purposes, suspends this remedy in order to promote the public interest, until the wrongdoer shall have been prosecuted for the public wrong. 1 Miles, Rep. 316-17; 12 East, 409; R. T. H. 359; 1 Hale’s P. C. 546; 2 T. R. 751, 756; 17 Ves. 329; 4 Bl. Com. 363; Bac. Ab. Trepass, E 2; and Trover, D. This principle has been adopted in New Hampshire N. H. R. 239; but changed in New York by statutory provision; 2 Rev. Stat. 292, 2 and by decisions in Massachusetts, except perhaps in felonies punishable with death; 15 Mass. R. 333; in Ohio; 4 Ohio R. 377; in North Carolina; 1 Tayl. R. 58. By the common law, in cases of homicide, the civil remedy is merged in the felony. 1 Chit. Pr. 10. Vide art. Injuries; Merger.
CIVILIAN. A doctor, professor, or student of the civil law.
CIVILITER. Civilly; opposed to criminaliter or criminally.
2. When a person does an unlawful act injurious to another, whether with or without an intention to commit a tort, he is responsible civiliter. In order to make him liable criminaliter, he must have intended to do the wrong; for it is a maxim, actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea. 2 East, 104.
CIVILITER MORTUUS. Civilly dead; one who is considered as if he were naturally dead, go far as his rights are concerned.
CLAIM. A claim is a challenge of the ownership of a thing which a man has not in possession, and is wrongfully withheld by another. Plowd. 359; Wee i Dall.444; 12 S. & R. 179.