Vengeancia (updated Dec. 2014) This article was inspired by this PDF from Eric Wesley Lynch, who seems to have borrowed heavily from other sources without citations, including the excellent Fruit from a Poisonous Tree by Melvin Stamper. I don’t have time to do much, but I’m in here today doin’ a few things.

“The word ‘vessel’ includes every description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water.” 1 U.S. Code § 3

“The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.” Dresden James

Who the hell is Dresden James? No one knows! But it’s a great quote, eh?! Lynch’s article is pretty hard to follow. I’ll be working on this page for a while! I started October 6th, 2012, and I’m workin’ my way down. So, the top part is reasonably coherent, but it gets pretty messy toward the bottom. Be sure to read Trusts are Everywhere. Read about Modern Money Mechanics and listen to Mary Elizabeth Croft explain what’s going on. Check out Lawful Rebellion. Check out the British Constitution Group. Check out The UCC Connection from Howard Freeman here.

§654. Public and commercial vessels and other watercraft; sale of fuel, supplies, and services; it’s here. 14 U.S.C. 654 – Public and commercial vessels and other watercraft; sale of fuel, supplies, and services; it’s here. Check out The Archeology of Watercraft Abandonment, Amazon. Read here. Read here. “The term ‘vessel of the United States’, as used in this title, means a vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States, or any citizen thereof, or any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof.”18 U.S. Code § 9

“But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it: for in the day that you eat thereof you shall surely die.” Gen. 2:17 “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD” Deut. 6:4 “In the beginning, Elohim created the heavens and the earth.” Gen. 1:1 Is “God” plural? Can it mean “gods,” as in “little gods?”

Does the United States trade U.S. Citizens in international commerce?
Does the United States trade parts of real people in international commerce?

“If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means – to declare that the Government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal – would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this Court should resolutely set its face.” From Elkins Et Al v. United States, 364 U.S. 206

YHWH is called Eloha (God), the singular form of Elohim…..

Read more about singular vs. plural.

At M4F, we don’t advocate following OUR OWN advice, let alone the advice of most of the other “patriot” organizations floating around on the internet. But you can learn a few things from all of these folks! Ultimately, you have to do YOUR OWN research and just figure it all out yourself.

Knowledge – you have to own it. You have to make it yours. Take SEDM, for example. Lots of stuff! Then, there’s also Family Guardian. Check out Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee. Check out Why You are Not Eligible for Social Security.

 Here’s a long entry re: quasi in rem jurisdiction from the Free Dictionary:

“The power of a court to hear a case and enforce a judgment against a party, even if the party is not personally before the court, solely because the party has an interest in real property or Personal Property within the geographical limits of the court.”

“Quasi in rem is a type of Personal Jurisdiction exercised by a court over a party who owns property within the jurisdictional boundaries of the court. A court must have personal jurisdiction over the parties to a case before it can bind them with its decision. A court can gain personal jurisdiction over a party who resides in the court’s home state; a court can also gain jurisdiction over an out-of-state party who has made some contact with the state or who owns property within the court’s geographical limits. There are two types of jurisdiction based on property: quasi in rem and in rem.

“Both in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction are based on the presence of the party’s property within the court’s territorial authority. In each instance the court may exercise jurisdiction without the actual presence of the party in court. The distinction between the two types of jurisdiction involves the nature of the dispute to which each applies and the extent of the authority each conveys. In rem (Latin for “against the thing”) jurisdiction applies where the dispute involves the property itself.

“A court exercising in rem jurisdiction has the authority to make a decision as to the property’s ownership that will be binding on all the world. Quasi in rem (Latin for “sort of against the thing”) jurisdiction applies to personal suits against the defendant, where the property is not the source of the conflict but is sought as compensation by the plaintiff. The authority of a court exercising quasi in rem jurisdiction is limited to a determination of the respondent’s interest in the property.

“A respondent in a quasi in rem proceeding is entitled to receive notice of the proceeding. If the respondent makes an appearance to defend against a quasi in rem claim, he may be forced to defend against all the claims made by the plaintiff. In many states a respondent may avoid this by making a limited appearance to defend the case on the merits with only the property located in the area at stake.

The concept of quasi in rem jurisdiction has become all but obsolete. It is no longer acceptable for a state court to gain personal jurisdiction over a defendant merely because the defendant owns property in the state. In Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S. Ct. 2569, 53 L. Ed. 2d 683 (1977), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a respondent must have a minimum level of purposeful contacts with the forum state before a state court may gain jurisdiction over the respondent. With enough contacts a respondent is deemed to have consented to the jurisdiction of the state and its courts. The Shaffer Court also held that courts should consider fair play and substantial justice in determining whether to require the appearance of an out-of-state respondent. These considerations should be applied to all forms of personal jurisdiction: in personam, in rem, and quasi in rem.

“The practical effect of the Shaffer decision is to limit the number of cases based on in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction. Due to the increasingly interstate nature of commerce in modern society, the average person may have contacts with, or own property in, several far-away states without even knowing it. Without a narrowed treatment of quasi in rem jurisdiction, potential civil respondents would be open to suit in any number of states with which they have no real connection. To guard against the abuse of quasi in rem jurisdiction, courts tend to closely examine intangible, movable property such as money and other negotiable instruments, such as stocks, bonds, and insurance policies. To exercise quasi in rem jurisdiction over money or other negotiable instruments, a court will examine the nature of the respondent’s contacts with the state and the relation of the property to the underlying dispute.

“Quasi in rem jurisdiction as a basis for personal jurisdiction has been almost completely absorbed by long-arm statutes. These statutes help plaintiffs gain in personam jurisdiction, so quasi in rem jurisdiction, with its limited relief, is frequently unnecessary. However, if the plaintiff’s home state does not have a long-arm statute and an out-of-state respondent owns property in the state, the plaintiff may seek an attachment of the property by asking the court to exercise quasi in rem jurisdiction over the property.”

Further readings

Hannan, Edward A. 1998. “Using Quasi-In-Rem Jurisdiction to Prevent Pre-Suit Loss or Alteration of Evidence.” Defense Counsel Journal 65 (April): 247.

“Quasi-In-Rem Jurisdiction and the Question of Due Process for Foreign Entities.” 1998 Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 26 (fall): 119–22.

West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more.
“If, whenever an officer or employee of a corporation were summoned before a grand jury as a witness he could refuse to produce the books and documents of such corporation, upon the ground that they would incriminate the corporation itself… we are of the opinion that there is a clear distinction in this particular between an individual and a corporation, and that the latter has no right to refuse to submit its books and papers for an examination at the suit of the state. The individual … is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited.
“He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” HALE v. HENKEL, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

…And we have not now the slightest difficulty in holding…in the general principles and doctrines of commercial jurisprudence.” Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)

We find this definition of “person” at 26 USC § 7701 – Definitions: “Person – The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.” Read more.

So, apparently, the U.S. Code can treat a “person” in at least 7 ways! Like Dorothy, in the Wizard of Oz, a person can be dressed up to play various roles in order to meet all of the corporation’s profit objectives! And like the poor woman in the movies, The Three Faces of Eve, and Identity, each role can be made to act totally independently of the others, to conspire against one another, even!

Dorothy's "person" can be dressed up in various outfits to perform various goals for the U.S. Corporation.
Dorothy can be dressed up in various outfits to perform various goals for the U.S. Corporation.

To be free, we have to study and learn what words mean when people claiming authority try to use them to control us. A “person” is treated like a corporation, generally speaking, in the modern American courts. There are at least two “persons” defined, in general, in modern American law: a natural-person is a legal entity, which represents the real man or woman. An artificial-person is a legal entity that is not a human being.

n. pl. en·ti·ties1. Something that exists as a particular and discrete unit: Persons and corporations are equivalent entities under the law.2. The fact of existence; being.3. The existence of something considered apart from its properties.

So, an “entity” exists apart from the properties being associated with that entity. The “entity” that is the “individual” is a blank slate, with no character, which exists apart from the properties of the real man and woman that the entity is supposed to represent. With the real man’s consent, the “individual” takes on the non-living properties of the real man… his image or name.

Public officials often like to act under “color of law.” This means that they are attempting to act without having any real authority from a real man or woman. Only real men and women can make law. The real man or woman has life! He or she has eye color, hair color, etc….but these are not what makes real men and women alive. We have a living SOUL!!

A “corpse,” is “a dead body, especially the dead body of a human.” The word, corporation, probably means the dead body of a human or a group of humans. But the entity is a blank, kind of like in the movie, The Sixth Day.

Legal dictionaries are different than regular dictionaries. In addition, terms used within various Codes, Acts, Statutes, Ordinances, etc. are often defined differently. It is literally another language, which is why they call it “Legalese.” Check out Ballentine’s Law Dictionary.

“[I]n common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing the phrase are ordinarily construed to exclude it.” United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U. S. 600, 312 U. S. 604 (1941); accord, United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U. S. 258, 330 U. S. 275 (1947). Particularly is this true where the statute imposes a burden or limitation, as distinguished from conferring a benefit or advantage. United States v. Knight, 14 Pet. 301, 39 U. S. 315 (1840). Read more.

To summarize, you are either a sovereign or you are a person, but you can’t be both at the same time. You can HAVE a person, but if you want to be free, you don’t want to BE a person. Because if you ARE the person, then what happens to the sovereign? It would appear that people operate in LAW and persons operate in EQUITY. “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity…..” Article III, Section 2, U.S. Constitution.

“Equity creates property where there was none before.” Check out this presentation, Introduction to Trusts.

The Birth of the Individual

Under the UCC, Uniform Commercial Code, the person is defined as, and serves as a transmitting utility for the Goods, which includes “all things which are movable at the time the security interest attaches or which are fixtures (Section 9-313), but does not include money, documents, instruments, accounts, chattel paper, general intangibles, or minerals or the like (including oil and gas) before extraction. “Goods” also includes standing timber which is to be cut and removed under a conveyance or contract for sale, the unborn young of animals, and growing crops.”

Transmitting utility means “any person primarily engaged in the railroad, street railway or trolley bus business, the electric or electronics communications transmission business, the transmission of goods by pipeline, or the transmission or the production and transmission of electricity, steam, gas or water, or the provision of sewer service.”

We just learned that a person can be an individual, a trust, an estate, a partnership, an association, a company, or a corporation. But it CAN’T be a real man or a woman, because a real man or woman is a sovereign.

It is rumoured that the Certificate of Live Birth is traded in international commerce for profit, which mostly benefits the international banksters at the IMF, World Bank, Federal Reserve, etc. So, it sounds like a “transmitting utility” can be construed to mean a ship on land!

All Aboard the LAND SHIP!

“Governments descend to the Level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen…where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned. … For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.” Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942)

What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then Government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations, which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get to the court to enforce its demands, called statutes.

This case is very important because it is a 1942 case after the Erie RR v. Tomkins 304 U.S. 64, (1938) case in which the Legislatures and Judiciary changed from legislating under “Public Law”, which was in consonance with the Constitution, to legislating under “Public Policy” according to the wishes of the Creditors of the US Corporation.

Rumour has it that an application for a birth certificate is a corporate government negotiable instrument that attempts to equate, using the Law Merchant, the infinite “value” of a real human child with “money.” The term “birth certificate” often confuses 1) the original application certifying the circumstances of the birth, generally called the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth, which is rumoured to be a negotiable instrument, with 2) the certified copy of, or receipt for the ensuing registration of the application with the United States corporation of that birth, usually called a Certificate of Vital Record.

Of course, we, the people have INFINITE rights. We can delegate a few rights to any agency that we want, and retain the rest…..which are INFINITE! Did I say infinite? This is an important point. Whatever contract you may have entered, you still retain rights recognized by the 9th Amendment, to override any agreement! This is a HUGE point!

A “ruler” measures one thing against another. Check out the definition of ruler. Social Security Number info. Social Security Trust Fund here. Independent agencies of the United States Government here.



Law Merchant The system of rules and customs and usages generally recognized and adopted by traders as the law for the regulation of their commercial transactions and the resolution of their controversies. The law merchant is codified in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a body of law, which has been adopted by the states, that governs mercantile transactions.

I see you
“I see you.”

Did you know that the term, “individual,” is not defined in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856? The dictionary skips from indirect evidence to indivisible.

INDIRECT EVIDENCE. That proof which does not prove the fact in question, but proves another, the certainty of which may lead to the discovery of the truth of the one sought.

INDIVISIBLE. That which cannot be separated.

Here’s how the term is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary 7th Ed.

individual, adj. 1. Existing as an indivisible entity. 2. Of or relating to a single person or thing, as opposed to a group.

Learn more at 2003 Revisions of the U.S. Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the Fetal Death Report here. “A birth record contains information about the birth of an individual.” Read more at Vital Rec.

When a baby is born in America and around the Western World, the hospital documents (at the dock, by the dok-tor) the birth (a berth is created for the vessel) with a legal name called a title, and notes it in a distinctive style or appellation, Upper and Lower case, the name by which anything is known.

Know, from a Hebrew word, yada` (pronounced yaw-dah’):

“a primitive root; to know (properly, to ascertain by seeing).”

The idea of “knowing” is explored in Alex Proyas’ film, Knowing. Note that Jake Sully has two names, but Neytiri only has one in Cameron’s movie, Avatar:

Jake Sully: I see you.
Neytiri: I see you.

Director James Cameron also explores “knowing” and “seeing” in his movie, Titanic:

“Rose: You have a gift Jack, you do. You see people.
Jack: I see you.”

And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bore Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.
And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bore Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. Gen. 4:1

“The Na’vi language is the constructed language of the indigenous Na’vi used in the Avatar film and games…The Na’vi have a tribal communal culture. They have no written language. Their history is passed down by oral tradition through stories. Humans, in order to document it, use most English alphabet letters, plus two diacritics (ä, ì), three ejectives (px, tx, kx), and an apostrophe as a glottal stop.” Read more.

The Elite at the helm of the New World Order (NWO) are tribal. They exclude the common man from THEIR tribe and do not “see” us as their equals. Instead, they treat us like we are animals, cattle, “goyim.” With the registration of the Certificate of Live Birth, the flesh and blood human baby is hereafter treated by the Federal Corporation, IRS, IMF, etc. like a slave or an animal, with certain defining characteristics like weight, height, sex, and eye color. It is the sole item of cargo in a registered vessel, also called an “Individual.”

Under admiralty, the international banksters have seized U.S. Citizens and hold the real people in trust until such time as the U.S. debt is paid.
Under admiralty, the international banksters have seized U.S. Citizens and hold the real people in trust until such time as the U.S. debt is paid.

While the cargo is alive, the vessel is dead. As a living man or woman, you HAVE your “goods,” which is your real time, body, etc., and you have your vessel, which is your the abstraction of these in the legal system, but YOU are not either of these! However, once the real man or woman CONSENTS to allow himself or herself to be identified with the goods and/or the vessel, the entire system does not “see” the real man anymore. It only “sees” the goods/vessel. It merges the baby with the vessel, and this becomes the “res.”

The international banksters equate the living baby’s birth with value for them, which they call “money.” Whenever title of an item that is worth “money” is transferred into commerce, a trust is created. This certificate of registration of a vessel according to the registry acts, for the purpose of giving the vessel, aka an “individual,” a “person,” a national character, i.e., a “U.S. citizen” born in a Federal Zone, a hospital with a Zip Code, that is located in the Judicial District in which the birthing of the vessel occurs as identified by the filing with the State Department of Health, Office of Vital Statistics within 5 days after your delivery. The certificate is then sent to Washington, D.C., for which the hospital receives a check for that vessel.

USC : Title 5 – GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES “Allocation of grants. – The Secretary shall award grants to States under this paragraph based on the proportion that the estimated average annual number of birth certificates issued by a State applying for a grant bears to the estimated average annual number of birth certificates issued by all States.”

The American sovereign man or woman is the natural, lawful real flesh and blood man or woman on the land, aka a FOTL, Freeman on the Land, on the private side. His parents give him a Christian name written in upper and lowercase letters. The insertion, omission, or mistake in middle name or initial is immaterial. In the old days, families recorded the birth in the Bible. The Christian name is necessary in any process reverting one back to one’s natural self. Check out this presentation on birth certificates.

The Federal Corporation recognizes this man or woman on the public side, in equity, and that fictional person is called a non-resident alien. An alien is any individual, which is an artificial entity, a vessel, not a real man or woman.

Foreign Situs Trust

The personality of the living human being begins upon birth and survival of birth. When you get your Certificate of Live Birth that is when the public person with the three names comes into existence and that is your remedy in equity. If a person were to put all of his property under the name on the Certificate of Live Birth, the name that is written in upper and lowercase letters, and if he doesn’t enter into contracts with the Social Security Administration, etc., then that person’s property will be protected from the predatory corporations, because that is considered in law as a Foreign Situs Trust.

You don’t put periods, commas, colons, semi-colons or anything else in the name of this trust, because every time you do something like that, which is not the way it is written on the original birth certificate, you change the meaning of it.

Such trusts are created under foreign law. Foreign Situs Trusts are also called non-domestic, foreign, or offshore trusts.

You find in the United States Government Printing Office Style Manual, section 11.7 it says, “Names of vessels are quoted in matters printed in other than lowercase roman.” And it shows that a vessel name is written in all capital letters.

A vessel of the United States is defined in Title 18, section 9, “Vessels of the United States defined. The term vessel of the United States as used in this title means a vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof or any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States or any State or Territory or district or possession.”

The W-4 Form and Social Security Application

The next name, which comes into being, is the name written in upper and lowercase letters with a middle initial, like this: Joe M. Smith. That person is shown on the W-4 form. The W-4 form says, “Write your first name, middle initial and last name.” This is the name of the Trustee who turns over the res, the vessel, the name in caps, the Strawman, to the federal government. A trust is created whenever property or money or title is transferred, and that’s automatic.

When one person delivers money to another for a specific purpose, the transaction becomes a trust. So it is axiomatic that whenever title is transferred, a trust is automatically created. It is by operation of law, and it is an express trust because you requested to have it done. You completed the W-4 form. You walked into the Social Security Administration or the Passport Office with your birth certificate, the one in upper and lowercase letters, and you transferred title. From then on you were known by these agencies, not as the named person on the birth certificate, but as the person in all capital letters.

Another trust comes into existence with signing the SS-5 application for the social security account which states, “Your card will show your full, middle, and last name unless you show otherwise.” So, however you write it on the application – if you use three names, two names or initial – that is the way it will show on your card in all capital letters. So now you have asked the government to step in and take a fiduciary responsibility over the property of the trust. You have given power of attorney to the United States corporation over your Foreign Situs Trust.

Constructive Trust

A “Constructive Trust” is a trust created by a court when no formal trust actually exists. For example, if a person has title to certain property and/or takes possession of certain property when the property rightfully belongs to another person, then the court may rule that the holder of the title is actually holding it as a constructive trustee for the benefit of the rightful owner. This can occur whenever a person acquires title to property through fraud, breach of faith, ignorance or inadvertence. Read more.

§ 301.7701–7 Trusts—domestic and foreign. (a) In general.

(1) A trust is a United
States person if—
(i) A court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision
over the administration of the trust (court test); and (ii) One or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust (control test).

Revocable Trust

A “Revocable Trust” is a type of living trust in which the grantor retains the right, during his or her lifetime, to amend, change, revoke or terminate the trust within his or her sole discretion. A Revocable Trust is the type of living trust that is generally created when the objective is to avoid probate or to provide for continuity of management of one’s assets in the event of incompetence. Read more.

Irrevocable Trusts

A living trust, also called a revocable trust, enables the person who sets up the trust to subsequently make changes to it, including revoking it. An irrevocable trust is similar in that it holds assets for its beneficiaries and acts as instructed by its grantors, but different in that the contributions are irrevocable and therefore cannot be taken out of the trust by the grantor. Given this downside, why would anyone opt for an irrevocable trust rather than a revocable trust? Because they offer tax advantages that revocable trusts don’t, for example, by enabling you to give money and assets away even before you die.

Application for Social Security

USA-the-Republic.The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury, not the Social Security Administration, issues this Form. Although the current SS5 Forms do not state what department publishes them, the earlier SS5 Forms state that they are Department of the Treasury Forms. (You can get a photocopy of the SS5 you filled out by submitting Form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration). I will now prove that the Department of the Treasury IS a foreign power.

The Secretary of the Treasury is the head of the Treasury Department that issues SSN’s. He does not owe allegiance to the U.S.. He has allegiance to a foreign power.

Federal Law (22 USC 286a(a)) requires the President to appoint the U.S. Governor of the International Monetary Fund. This appointment is given to the Secretary of the Treasury (see “Legislative History” of Public Law 94-564, page 5942 where Congress is explaining how they are implementing the Bretton-Woods Treaty). If the President appoints someone to an official office required by law, and that position requires him to control you with powers pre-approved by Congress implemented by a Treaty, don’t you think his salary would be paid by his employer? Title 22 US Code, Section 286a(d)(1) prohibits your U.S. government from paying the U.S. Governor of the International Monetary Fund. That’s right! His employer pays his salary. Who’s chain of command are your under?

[Note: For those who do their homework: the “Agreement” mentioned in 22 USC 286a is the Bretton-Woods Treaty which stipulates that the Fund pay the Governors. Also notice that the Secretary of the Treasury is forced to accept “Amendments” on behalf of the U.S., whether we want them or not].

The Secretary of the Treasury is the U.S. representative to the International Monetary Fund. He also is the U.S. representative to INTERPOL, and has allegiance is to its’ superiors. Read more at USA-the-Republic.

The Grantor Type Trusts

The birth certificate is an irrevocable trust that is set up as an irrevocable trust and you cannot change the name on that unless you go to court. You cannot change it in any way, shape or form because you did not create that trust. However, the grantor type trust that is created under Social Security, you can change at any time, and you can revoke at any time, because you created that trust.

Principals, Agents, Fiduciaries

The following paragraphs explain the relationship that we have with all these corporations. They are all contractual.

3 Am.Jur.2d Agency § 1, at 509-10 (1986) “The term ‘agency’ means a fiduciary relationship by which a party confides to another the management of some business to be transacted in the former’s name or on his account, and by which such other assumes to do the business and render an account of it.   It has also been defined as the fiduciary relationship which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control, and consent by the other so to act.   Thus, the term ‘agency,’ in its legal sense, always imports commercial or contractual dealings between two parties by and through the medium of another.   In an agency relationship, ․ the one who acts for and represents the principal, and acquires his authority from him, is known and referred to as an ‘agent.’ ”

2A C.J.S. Agency § 4, at 552, 554-55 (1972) stating that “[a]gency is succinctly defined as a relation created by an agreement between the parties;  relationship between a principal and his agent;  the representation of one called the principal by another called the agent in dealing with third persons;  the relation resulting where one person authorizes another to act for him in business dealings with others,” and defining agent as “one who acts for or in the place of another by authority from him;  a person having express or implied authority to represent or act on behalf of another person who is called his principal;  a person employed or authorized by another to act for him, or to transact business for him․”

1A Michie’s Jurisprudence Agency § 2, at 666 (1993) “An agent is one who represents another, called the principal, in dealings with third persons.   He is one who undertakes some business or to manage some affair for another by authority of or on account of the latter and to render an account of it.”

Titles and Trusts

Whenever title is transferred, a trust is created by operation of law, or whenever money is transferred, it is the operation of law. A trust is automatically created. That is stated in Am. Jur. under trusts. The 13th amendment states, “…neither slavery nor involuntary servitude….” Those are prohibitions; there is no option. It says nothing regarding voluntary servitude: that is your choice. If you contract to be in voluntary servitude, that is your choice.

Then the 14th amendment, following immediately on the tail of the 13th amendment, reads – “…born or naturalized and subject to the jurisdiction…” When you fill out forms, they always ask if you are a citizen of the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Jurisdiction is the modern word for allegiance, which is a feudal term meaning relationship to the land or the liege. So are you subject to the jurisdiction of the United States as a citizen of the United States and of the state in which you reside?

The term “residence in a state” is not citizenship of a state. It is something less, usually commercial in nature. So on government applications, job applications, etc., they ask if you are a U.S. citizen and they ask for a residence address. The combination of being a citizen of the United States and a resident in a state means you are volunteering to be treated as though you are a second class citizen – property of the United States. When the term “United States” is used in the US Code, it usually refers to territories and possessions such as Guam, Puerto Rico, etc. “Citizen of the United States” is defined in the Code as being someone from Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands. You can find that at 20 CFR Section 404.1004, Part 4, “Citizens of the United States includes citizens of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam and American Samoa.”

You will find in 26 CFR, §301.7701-6, Definitions, Persons, Fiduciary you are the corpus of the trust that you created by the signing of the SS-5 application, and you authorized the government to be the Trustee of the Trust. That is why when people go into court, they can not understand why they are not being treated as a sovereign citizen in common law under an Article III court and they do not get any justice – because they are in equity, not in law, and they are the property that is being administered.

Fiduciary [is] distinguished from an agent. There may be a fiduciary relationship between an agent and a principal… The principal is the person who walks in and signs up with the government. The agent or the representative is the IRS, so forth. But the word “agent” does not denote a fiduciary. An agent having an entire charge of property with authority to effect and execute leases and tenants… Remember, we are tenants on our own property and we are leasing it. Entirely on his own responsibility and without consulting the principal (you), merely turning over the net proceeds from the property periodically to the principal by virtue of the authority conferred upon him by a power of attorney. People need to realize the power of attorney is the 1040 form.

United States District Courts

Many people go into the United States District Court, and that court is a territorial court. It is not the court of law court. It is created by virtue of the sovereign congressional faculty granted under Article IV, section 3, of that instrument. Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 US (Supreme Court).

The proper court to go into is the “district court of the United States,” small “d,” small “c,” and that’s the law side of the court. However, to get into that court your status must be correct.

When you are in equity, you have to do it according to their rules, because in equity they create the rules. A lot of things we are doing are under law and not under equity, so we have to know how to do them under equity, based on their rules. Because we “volunteered” in, we have to go by their rules.

The Power to Re-Vest Title

26 CFR 1.676A-1, Power to re-vest title to portions of the trust property in grantor; general rule. If a power to re-vest in the grantor title to any portion of a trust is exercisable by the grantor or non-adverse party or both, without the approval or consent of an adverse party…That’s the government. So you have the power to revoke the power of attorney and re-vest and to terminate.

When we were born, a trust, called a Cestui Que Vie Trust (“CQV”) was set-up, for our benefit. Evidence of this is the birth certificate. But what is the value which must be conveyed to the trust, in order to create it? It was our right to property (via Birth into this world), our body (via the Live Birth Record), and our souls (via Baptism). Since the state/province which registered the trust is the owner, it is also the trustee…. the one that administers the trust. Since they, also, wanted to be beneficiary of this trust, they had to come up with ways to get us, as beneficiary, to authorize their charging the trust, allegedly, for our benefit (via our signature on a document: citation, application, etc.), and then, temporarily transfer trusteeship, to us, during the brief time that they want to be the beneficiary of a particular “constructive” trust. More.

The Trust Corpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as the Estate from two Latin words e+statuo literally meaning “by virtue of decree, statute or judgment”. However, as the Estate is held in a Temporary not permanent Trust, the (Corporate) Person as Beneficiary is entitled only to equitable title and the use of the Property, rather than legal title and therefore ownership of the Property. Only the Corporation, also known as Body Corporate, Estate and Trust Corpus of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust possesses valid legal personality. More.

Sui Juris

The common law person is sui juris, outside of equity, so he is the only one that can do this procedure. Another thing is the Address must be written in a Foreign Address because it is the law of Domicile which determines what laws are going to be applicable.
When you look up “born,” it gives you the word “deliver.” When you look up “delivery,” it is when the res of your trust, the birth certificate (written in upper and lowercase letters, not the one that is now in capital letters on the bank paper), is transferred constructively to the Federal government. Under Am Jur, under “trust,” it says that whenever title is transferred, or property is transferred, a trust is automatically created by operation of law, regardless of the intent of the parties. So, when you walked in with your birth certificate in upper and lowercase letters and you transferred title, you created this new entity in all capital letters, The Straw-Man.
Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., on page 1142, definitions of persons. To understand this even further, Black’s Law Dictionary uses the word “entity.” When you look up “entity,” it is defined on page 532 as “a real being, existence, an organization or being that possesses separate existence for tax purposes.” So they got you to create this separate being, this so-called straw man, person, entity, corporation, trust, partnership, whatever, so they could tax that. That’s the entity they are taxing because they have no legal authority to tax the individual. The 16th Amendment gave them no new authority to tax anybody.
So the law says you have the power to change this situation and to revoke that situation at any time.

The Different Kinds of Law

Volume IV, Business Law, by Nathan Isaac. It talks about the different kinds of law that must be dealt with: Contract, agency, corporation, trusteeship, and one they don’t mention here is admiralty, which is insurance. That’s where the Social Security comes in that puts us I but it says you can cancel the admiralty contract. There is an agency relationship. can If you look up “agency” in Black’s you’ll find that you hired the IRS to handle this account for you, and it is a power of attorney. If you don’t revoke the power of attorney, then the attorney come around your back and undo everything you’ve done.
An attorney said. This is out of the Rocky Mountain News, November 13, 1995, in Colorado. He says, “The power of attorney should not be given to another person lightly. It depends on the scope of the document. … If it is financial [the power of attorney], it can give the agent [the person who gets the power of attorney] the ability to rob you blind.” And that’s what these guys are doing to us, they are robbing us blind.
It also says here that you have to revoke that power of attorney. Am.Jur. under agency says you have to revoke the instrument. Many patriots seem to be under the impression that you revoke the signature, but that is not correct. You revoke the instrument.
Look in Am. Jur. Encyclopedia of the Law under “agency” and it will tell you how that agency relation works and how that agent can undo everything you have done, if you do not revoke it.
Give you an example, under UCC you will not find murder. The UCC only covers two things, orders to pay and promises to pay. Murder doesn’t come under that. It has been said that commerce is defined in Title 27, and all crimes are commercial. That may be, but they are commercial because they are admiralty. What puts you in admiralty is the insurance program of social security. Insurance is under admiralty law. That’s what gets us into commercial activity with the government, across state lines. You’ll find all those crimes listed in Title 27 U.S.C. section 72.11 in Benedict on Admiralty 7th Edition Revised, Jurisdiction and Principles, 1988 Supplement. It lists all the crimes in Title 27 as under admiralty law because there are no common law crimes in the federal jurisdiction, so they all must be commercial

The Vessel

That’s why they 20 CFR 404.1004, part 3, American vessel means a vessel documented or numbered under the laws of the United States.
So that’s what vessels is, and remember, the vessel is the straw man. You’ll see that in the Government Style Manual are commercial crimes, and what puts you in that jurisdiction is the contract Title 26 is the Trust Fund, and it is the Puerto Rican Trust. Trust 62 Statutes at Large, Volume 48, 73rd Congress, Session 2, Chapter 756, June 26, 1934. Under that section you’ll find that the trust is called #62 Puerto Rico Special Fund Internal Revenue. So Title 26 contains the laws of the trust. In fact, all the titles are the laws of the trust.

And it says in here: The funds appearing on the books of the government and listed in subsection (b) and (c) of this section, shall be classified on the books of the Treasury as trust funds. All monies accruing to these funds are hereby appropriated and shall be disbursed in compliance with the terms of the trust. Hereafter, monies received by the government as trustee analogous to these funds named in section (b) and (c) of this section and not otherwise herein provided for . . .

The Puerto Rican Trust

It gives the names of quite a few of the trusts, and #62 is the Puerto Rican Trust.
Another section people want to look at is Title 31 Money and Finance, sub-chapter 2, Administrative, section 321, General Authority of the Secretary, and #2 under that says: For the purposes of the federal income, estate, and gift taxes, property accepted under paragraph 1 shall be considered as a gift or bequest to or for the use of the United States.
So all the monies that are given to the United States are from the trust and they are gifts, because the trust that is created on the social security is a charitable trust, and the government is not taxing the individual, they are taxing the trust, because the flesh and blood person they cannot tax without apportionment. So they are obeying the law, the thing is, we don’t know what the law says.
The 14th amendment doesn’t really talk about two citizenships. It creates a new one, which is a federal citizen. Those citizens are from Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands. Supra.
Was set up in Puerto Rico, so when you state you are a United States citizen, you are a citizen of Puerto Rico. That’s where you immigrated. An American National doesn’t have to be naturalized. The 14th amendment talks about being naturalized, well what you missed is, “all persons born.” When were you born? Look up the word “born” in a law dictionary. It mentions the word “delivery.” “Delivery” is when the property or the res was transferred, and that’s when you transferred your name or title from the person on the birth certificate, written in upper and lowercase letters.

The Alien Individual Trust

When they transferred over to equity, they had to give you something equivalent to a sovereign individual, and that equivalent is called the non-resident alien individual, which is a trust. You find that in Black’s when you look under “trusts,” it says foreign situs trust and it says it is a trust which owes its existence to foreign law. It is treated for tax purposes as a non-resident alien individual. But a nonresident alien working for a corporation can be taxed. However, that is because he is within their jurisdiction, and he is working for a corporation. However, you can get an exemption, and there is a form for that. There is a form for a person who works for a corporation, and there is one for the independent contractor. That’s the term for the freeman in equity, but he must have an exemption.

A Violation of Fiduciary Duty

They now call a freeman a nonresident alien individual? There are no debtors in prison — the law says there are no debtor’s prisons in America. However, there are prisons for violation of fiduciary duty
So that is what people are being thrown in jail for, a violation of fiduciary duty, because they created this trust, made the government partial beneficiary of the trust, and they hired the IRS to handle that account and to effectuate their conduct and the conduct of third parties, the employer or whoever else you do business with. And that’s why you don’t get any remedy. And that’s why people end up in jail — violation of fiduciary duty. They do not tolerate that, at all.

Trust Fund Taxes or Employment Taxes

What people need to know, the tax in question that is being collected is not an income tax, it is called trust fund taxes or employment taxes. That is the tax that is being collected, trust fund taxes, and they are called employment taxes.

You’ll find the thing on employment taxes in Title 26 Internal Revenue section 3401 and it says “Employment taxes. The term employment tax means any tax imposed by Subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.” You’ll find that codified in 26 CFR 801.401 Employment Taxes, and it says, “Federal employment taxes are imposed by Subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code.” When you look under Subtitle C, you’ll find that the tax is voluntary, and that’s called a voluntary withholding agreement. That’s in 26 CFR 31.3402P-1, voluntary withholding agreement

Taxing the Fictitious Entity

The trustee is the one who pays the taxes. What is being taxed is the trust. The tax is attributed to the trust that you set up. That’s what is being taxed because they have no lawful authority to tax the individual, the natural person. When you look under “persons” in Black’s Law Dictionary, it talks about entity. When you look up “entity” in Black’s, it says, “A real being, existence, an organization or being that possess separate existence for tax purposes.” So they created another entity, called a trust, in order to tax, because they knew they couldn’t tax the natural, common law individual. The live individual they cannot tax. They are taxing the fictitious entity. So they got you to create this separate being, this so-called straw man, person, entity, corporation, trust, partnership, whatever, so they could tax that. That’s the entity they are taxing because they have no legal authority to tax the individual Status of vessels of the United States. Vessels documented under the laws of the United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations described by the laws of the Untied States for merchant vessels.

So here it says it is the documentation that gets you in trouble.

Section 81.4 under Regulations, Appendix B-13, Status of American undocumented vessels. American undocumented vessels are not under the jurisdiction of the United States and consequently are not subject to the obligations nor entitled to protections.

Admiralty Law Extrapolated On Land

Here it is saying it is the documentation that gets you in trouble. Then if you want to find out what the number does you go to section 783.41, which talks about the number of the vessels, and it says you are required to have a number if you are going to operate in admiralty waters, which is on their highways and their business and contracts — that it’s not the number which gets you in trouble, it is the documentation. The government has a form to cancel the documentation or the SS-5 application. So I’ve proved my point right there. They think it is very important to cancel the application. It says nothing about the number. When you apply for Social Security, it doe So unless you get rid of the documentation, and there is a form to do that, however, it must be done in the correct way, then you are subject to the obligations, if you don’t get rid of that documentation. And if anyone wants to see what the documentation is, they even define what documentation is, and here it is. You’ll find it in the same thing, Benedict on Admiralty, section 783.41, “Numbered vessels.” And in it, it says it is not the number that does you in; you need a number to operate in admiralty. They say it right there. And remember, they took the admiralty law extrapolated on land doesn’t say on the SS-5 that you are applying for a number, it says you are applying for a card, or the documentation.

So the straw man, I want to make this clear, is a person, corporation, trust, and all those things which are considered vessels or entities, real beings possessing separate existence for tax purposes. And you create that entity when you sign up for Social Security. That’s when you created the straw man. You created it, they didn’t, and the law says you created this when you walked in and you transferred title.

Another thing about the document of title, I believe there are two birth certificates. There is the one they give now, which is on the bank note paper. I believe that one you actually transfer title. The previous ones written in upper and lowercase letters, and certificates of live are birth, versus those new ones you get now, which are documents of title that you still hold, but what it says is you transferred it constructively.

When you look up “delivery,” it says it is not actual transfer; it is constructive delivery of the trust. It is constructive, not actual, so you still have title. I already read that the law says you are treated as the owner, even though you are not treated as the owner underneath their law. And at all times you have the power to revoke. Oddly enough, there is a law that says you can revoke this fiduciary relationship of principle and agent that you got yourself into.

26 CFR 301.6903-1 Notice of Fiduciary Relationship. When the fiduciary capacity has terminated, the fiduciary, in order to be relieved of any further duty or liability as such, must file with the District Director…

The District Director is the District Director of the IRS in your region or area, and it is not the Secretary of State.

Leave a Reply