What is a “Sovereign Citizen?”

Vengeancia (updated April 2015) In the old days, Citizen with a capital “C” was roughly equivalent to “We, the People.” However, in the modern era of the Federal Reserve fiat currency, and THE MATRIX = fictional corporate jurisdictional overlay on the land, calling oneself any kind of “citizen,” can be risky! It’s a fiction, isn’t it? Are you a fiction? I don’t think so… not if you are reading this! By the way, what is a “giver?” Read here, here.

“Both inland piracy and press-ganging have been outlawed for 200 years. Both carry a range of penalties up to and including capital punishment. Likewise, violation of the Geneva Convention Protocols of 1949, Volume II, Article 3 — the mischaracterization of identity or nationality of civilians — is a death penalty offense….” Sat, Apr 15, 2015, Judge Anna Van Reitz, Morning Liberty. Read here. Read here. Read more at Maine Republic. Check out The Politics of Civilian Identity by Daniel Rothbart, here.

"Sovereign citizen," like "jumbo shrimp", is an Oxymoron!
“Sovereign citizen,” like “jumbo shrimp”, is an Oxymoron!

Check out the heavy spin on this article: Sovereign Citizens: A Clear and Present Danger, here. So, the police are being propagandized by the banksters! What are peaceful men and women to do? Bankrupt Corporate So-Called Government, this video. De Facto Courts, video. Read here, here, here. For starters, you have to listen to this presentation on “livestock management,” from Clint Richardson, Killing Your Strawman 2, A Free Man’s Chronicle, Reality Blog, here. Check out videos and ideas from Kurt Kallenbach.

STOCK: “In stock ‘in the possession of a trader’ is from 1610s. Meaning ‘broth made by boiling meat or vegetables’ is from 1764. Theatrical use, in reference to a company regularly acting together at a given theater, is attested from 1761. Figurative phrase take stock in ‘regard as important’ is from 1870. As the collective term for the movable property of a farm, it is recorded from 1510s; hence livestock.” Read more. Hmmm. Big Pharma? Watch John Oliver’s video.

“Here are a few presumptions that are erroneous; the federal government is superior to the States of the Union, federal law supersedes State law, the United States of America is one nation. None of these presumptions are fact and truth. These are false.” Read more. Read about Constitutional law.

I’ve been thinking about all of this a lot lately. I’m no expert, so don’t take my word for anything! Always do your own due diligence!

Stone Soup by Jon J. Muth
Stone Soup by Jon J. Muth

Hmmm. Philosopher’s Stone? Stone the builders rejected? Psalm 118:22. Want to make some Stone Soup? We, the People….right? Not, we, the “sovereign citizens!!!??” Check out USA vs US. Check out Not a Citizen. Notice to Perform or Cease and Desist, here. Listen to this audio from Rod Class, here.

Seems to me that “sovereign citizen”, like “military intelligence” and “jumbo shrimp” is an oxymoron. Read more. For background, watch this video. Read here. A “sovereign” is not a “person.” See United Mine Workers vs. United States, 330 U.S. 258.

INIQUITY:1. gross injustice or wickedness. 2. a violation of right or duty; wicked act; sin.” Read more. “A technical expression applied to the decision of an inferior judge who has decided contrary to law; he is said to have committed iniquity…It is inequitable to permit some to trade and to prohibit others…It is unjust that freemen should not have the free disposal of their own property.” Black’s Law, 2nd Ed. “…therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken.” Genesis 3:23 Check out my article, Never Forget 9/11 – Countries Around the World Admit to False Flag Terror, here.

“Political sovereignty is the assertion of the self-determinate will of the organic people, and in this there is the manifestation of its freedom.” Black’s Law 2nd Ed.

Check out The Nation: The Foundations of Civil Order and Political Life in the United States, Elisha Mulford (1877), here. Romanticism, Nationalism, and the New Economics: Elisha Mulford and the Organic Theory of the State by Mark E. Neely, Jr., (1977), here. Read here.

“All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.” Animal Farm, George Orwell. “…democracy ruled by the majority places the individual at the bottom, and an unknown elite, Mr. ‘X’ at the top.” Read more about The Federal Zone.

"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others." Animal Farm, George Orwell.
“All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.” Animal Farm, George Orwell.

“…you aren’t the STATUTORY ‘citizen’ described in 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1 who is the proper subject of Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code, nor are you a ‘resident’ of the ‘United States’ defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) if you were born in a state of the Union and are domiciled there.  Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code only applies to persons domiciled within the federal zone  and payments originating from within the United States government.

“If you are domiciled in a state of the Union, then you aren’t domiciled in the federal zone.  Consequently, the only type of ‘individual’ you can be as a person born in a state of the Union is a ‘non-citizen national’ as defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21) and 8 U.S.C.  §1452 and a ‘nonresident alien’ as defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B).” Read more at Family Guardian.

The United States Government Manual is a special edition of the Federal Register (1 CFR 9.1). It’s here. “The faith of the United States Government is pledged to pay, in legal tender, principal and interest on the obligations of the Government issued under this chapter.” 31 U.S.C. Section 3123

FAITH: “1. Confidence; credit; rellanca Thus, an act may be said to be done “on thefaith” of certain representations.2. Relief; credence; trust. Thus, the constitution provides that “full faith and credit”shall be given to the judgments of each state In the courts of the others.3. Purpose; intent; sincerity; state of knowledge or design. This is the meaning ofthe word in the phrases “good faith” and “bad faith.”In Scotch law. A solemn pledge; an oath. “To make faith” is to swear, with theright hand uplifted, that one will declare the truth….” Black’s Law, 2nd Ed.

God’s Law the Foundation of Free Government by Carolyn Alder

DE JURE: “Of right; legitimate; lawful ; by right and just title. In this sense it is the
contrary of de facto…” Black’s Law, 2nd Ed.

DE FACTO: “In fact, in deed, actually. This phrase is used to characterize an officer, a government, a past action, or a state of affairs which exists actually and must be accepted for all practical purposes, but which is illegal or illegitimate.” Black’s Law, 2nd Ed.

“The percentage you’re paying is too high priced While you’re living beyond all your means. And the man in the suit has just bought a new car From the profit he’s made on your dreams…” The Low Spark of High-Heeled Boys by Steve Winwood & Traffic

“The U.S. Supreme Court has held in Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)  that there are three different meanings and contexts for the word ‘United States’.  Hence, there are three different types of ‘citizens of the United States’ “….Read more at Family Guardian.

Check out Real Libertarianism, here. Check out Getting a Non-Citizen National Passport by SEDM, PDF. Also, Why You are a National, State National and Constitutional but Not Statutory Citizen by SEDM, PDF. ALso, Citizenship Diagrams by SEDM, PDF.

Just like when you play Monopoly: Sovereign people operate pursuant to "law"; subject matter tokens operate pursuant to "legal."
Just like when you play Monopoly: Sovereign people operate pursuant to “law”; subject matter tokens operate pursuant to “legal.”

“Richard James, McDonald is a state Citizen of California. Mr. McDonald is a former law enforcement officer who stumbled across this information quite by accident but felt compelled to investigate the issues related to law enforcement and status.  Based on results of  Mr. McDonald’s research, he took the extraordinary step of renouncing his “US citizenship”, (the reasons why should become clear to the reader as they review the information posted here), by reclaiming his “birth rights” and original political status, which by the way, is exactly the same as the Founding Fathers who were state Citizens, not ‘US citizens’. Read more.

“President Roosevelt had all these training manuals destroyed so that he could institute a democracy. That’s his New Deal — communism.” Read more from Mr. McDonald, here. Here’s a great background video from Richard McDonald. I don’t agree with everything Richard McDonald is saying! Also make up your own mind about what you read and hear.

HOOVEN & ALLISON CO. v. EVATT, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO 324 U.S. 652 (1945), PDF.

STATE OF TEXAS v. WHITE, 74 U.S. 700 (1868), PDF

Have you seen Robocop (2014)?  Check out Randy Stroud’s Sovereign Tactics site. Check out Dave Darby. Here’s a Robb Ryder playlist. Check out Bill Thorton. Check out Karl Lentz. Read the article and watch the videos, Spielberg Film, Eagle Eye, Predicted Yemen Drone Stroke, here. Check out these flyers from Luis Ewing. Read 3 Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent, here.

A Kid’s Guide to the U.S. Government, here. Check out Trent Goodbaudy’s Lawful Traveler package. Here’s an article about a Canadian sovereign man, Brian Alexander, Read Accept the Deed and Be the Owner, here. Read this article, Just Ask Robert De Niro: The Achilles Heel is “You,” here. Watch these videos:

“The three Fairbanks militia defendants were in a federal courtroom in Anchorage on Monday, using attorneys to assert their constitutional rights before a presidentially appointed judge, a far cry from the Denny’s restaurant that their leader once declared to be his sovereign citizen courtroom.” Fairbanks Militia Defendants Face More Federal Charges Here.

Two statements jump out  1) using attorneys to assert rights and 2) sovereign citizen. First of all, God creates people, who are always “sovereign,” since ALL governments purport to act for the benefit of the people, who are created by God……don’t they? The “government” creates “citizens,” who are subjects. People stand “under” a government by consent.

“Lyin’, cheatin’, hurtin, that’s all you seem to do. Messin’ around with every guy in town,  Puttin’ me down for thinkin’ of someone new. Always the same, playin’ your game, Drive me insane, trouble is gonna come to you, One of these days and it won’t be long, You’ll look for me but baby, I’ll be gone…..” Your Time is Gonna Come, Led Zeppelin

Who does an Attorney work for? Not We, the People! An attorney is an officer of the corporate U.S. His or her job is to transfer your rights to the new feudal lord. Check out I am Free Will with Peter Eugene here. Also, check out articles and videos from Kurt Kallenbach at Trust and Contract.

State citizenship

U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.”

Wesley Snipes made the CRUCIAL mistake of requesting protection as a lower case “c” 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States”….A 14th Amendment citizen is a “Federal citizen” with civil rights (given by government) and specifically NOT a “Constitutional Citizen” with “human rights” (rights from birth). Read more.

“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States.  Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it’s own…” 
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

“…he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,…”  “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. 
McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)

“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,…” 
Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)

“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government …” 
Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383

State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: “the term ‘citizen’ in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject’ in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government.”

Supreme Court, Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226:


”The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.”

Supreme Court: US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957:
”The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States.”

“It is the duty of all officials whether legislative, judicial, executive, administrative, or ministerial to so perform every official act as not to violate constitutional provisions.” Montgomery v state 55 Fla. 97-45S0.879

a; find it in the Southern Reporter Volume 45, here.

“Six members of the antigovernment Alaska Peacemakers Militia, including its leader, Francis Schaeffer Cox, 28, are arrested and charged with plotting to kill or kidnap state troopers and a Fairbanks judge. The group already has a large cache of weapons, including a .50-caliber machine gun, grenades and a grenade launcher. Cox earlier identified himself as a “sovereign citizen.” Cox is convicted in June 2012 on nine counts, including conspiring to kill a judge and law enforcement officials. He is sentenced in January 2013 to almost 26 years in federal prison. Lonnie Vernon, 56, and his wife, Karen, 66, plead guilty in August to charges they plotted to kill a federal judge and an IRS agent involved in a tax case against them. The Vernons are also sentenced in January 2013. Lonnie receives almost 25 years in federal prison while his wife receives 12 years. Another member, Coleman Barney, 38, is found guilty of weapons charges and sentenced in September 2012 to five years in federal prison.” Read more at SPLC.

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906).

Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states: “No State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts.” The individual’s right to contract is unlimited and no State may interfere with that right. Read more.

A U.S. Person is an entity not a real man or woman
A U.S. Person, aka “born alive” is an entity who “lives” at the bottom; it’s not a real man or woman!

Citizen is a noun. A citizenship is a relationship between a “citizen” and a “ship.” It’s a non-tangible “entity,” and/or an agreement, a legal fiction; you can HAVE one, but you surely cannot BE one.

Moreover, a citizenship, just like software out of the box, has default values aka Statutes, Codes, and Ordinances. You may want to customize your relationship(s) to better fit your needs, right? Something to think about….

“If our being is a property right … then we can be sold, or we can sell ourselves, destroying liberty. If we can contract away our will, then we could contract away responsibility (for murder, rape etc.),destroying justice.” Read more.

Americans have “birthright citizenship,” meaning we have a right to our souls, bodies, and our” land.” We have a right to the “land of our soul.” Unfortunately, with the birth certificate registration, these rights go bye-bye when the Elite folks that are running the Amerikan cartel, the privately-owned corporation dba the US of A “borrow” them without telling you! Check out Stating Your Claim.

You might want to think of “Law” as the study of how real peoples’ unalienable Rights get turned into civil and legal privileges by a crafty Elite who count themselves in charge and declare themselves to be the “sovereign.” Here’s a few definitions:

Sovereignty refers to the independent legal authority of a population in a particular territory, based on the recognized right to self-determination.

SOVEREIGNTY – …By “Sovereignty”, in its largest sense is meant supreme, absolute, uncontrollable power, the absolute right to govern.

For example, God has sovereignty over all creation. “He Who is the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords” 1 Timothy 6:15

Only people, created in the image and likeness of God, have any claim to sovereignty. Seems to me a “citizenship” is like a “membership” in a club, for example, a fitness club. Flesh and blood people with unalienable Rights never give up our Rights just because we happen to have a membership in a club. We can never agree to stop being real people and turn ourselves into tokens on a Monopoly board. This is why our Rights are unalienable. Like our eye color, human Rights can never be taken from us. They are an ontological constant.

So really, just like Jesus observed, there are two ontological “things” being discussed: 1) a real flesh and blood man or woman, who is a lawful sovereign and 2) a legal fiction, which he or she may possess, which is a legal thing aka an entity. Both exist simultaneously. Forcing a man or woman to admit to BEING a citizen is like asking him or her to admit to being a sewing machine, top hat, or race car! There are a lot of very bright patriots and others who are very knowledgeable re: the united states and the 14th amendment, etc., that miss this point.

Further, why would you need a driver’s license, or any type of license, really, to make use of roads, except to permit cops, magistrates, etc., acting under Color of Law, to ticket and harass you? Read about the Citizen’s right to travel. It’s not the people who need the license, it’s the usurpers that need the license. If you agree to the whole affair, you agree to exploit and take advantage of real men and women who have rights to breath, move around, etc. The private corporation masquerading as the United States needs a license to violate YOUR Rights…..not you!

Read this info from The Federal Zone. More here about citizenship. Check out this info from Richard James, McDonald. I’ve posted a number of articles lately here and here and here related to the so-called “sovereign citizens,” and the trouble they are causing allegedly to the so-called authorities. For the record, we are not “sovereign citizens” at Musicians 4 Freedom. We are FOTLs aka Freemen on the Land, aka, freemen/people and sovrans.

Here are relevant definitions from Merriam Webster and the Etymology Dictionary–

Self-governing not being under the rule or control of another <she left home and became entirely self-governing and financially independent at the age of 18>

Related Words freeborn; delivered, emancipated, freed, liberated, manumitted, redeemed, released; unconquered, unruled, unsupervised; empowered, enfranchised; democratic, republican

Sovereign late 13c., from O.Fr. soverain, from V.L. *superanus “chief, principal,” from L. super “over” (see super-). Spelling influenced by folk-etymology association with reign. Milton spelled it sovran, as though from It. sovrano. Meaning “gold coin worth 22s 6d” first recorded late 15c.; value changed 1817 to 1 pound. As an adj., attested from early 14c.; of remedies or medicines, “potent in a high degree,” from late 14c.

In a criminal defense capacity, attorneys deal in PRIVILEGES that they call “rights.”

“The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the man who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in the flesh.” Read more.

Anyone who claims to be a sovereign/sovran/people probably ought not to be “re-presenting” himself as a corporation-created citizen=subject or using a defense attorney! Have you researched the meaning of the word, “attorn?” Have you investigated the BAR? Rachel Barney, an associate of Shaeffer Cox and the folks up in Alaska also retained an attorney. Hiring an attorney creates consent. Read more here.

Bouvier’s Maxims of Law states, “He who consents cannot receive an injury.” Therefore, the corollary must be true: “He who does not consent can receive an injury.” Also, a sovereign/sovran probably ought not to re-present him or herself, pro se. Real men and women, created by God, do not consent to be tokens in the Elite’s legal game. Of course, this is easier said than done!

Imagine a game of chess. All of the real people/sovereigns/sovrans are sitting around the game board; the citizens are the tokens on the game board, created by those who wish to take advantage of you. If it’s Monopoly, then the tokens would be like the little race cars and thimbles, etc. The corp. dba the Govt. is like a winning chess player. If you play, you lose.

It’s THEIR game. The corporation dba the Govt. of the US of A is like a PERMANENT PLAINTIFF, squatting on the American court system. They’ve been there so long, backed by the banksters, the BAR, the politicians, and the Elite, and municipalization into all the states and counties, that they’ve grown roots and convinced everyone they are legitimate! Peeps like Wesley Snipes STAND UNDER their law, and then ask the ridiculous question, “Show me the law!” What legitimizes the game? The peoples’ participation in it! Read more: The State: It’s Just an Act! You can’t be half on, and half off the game board. You are either operating pursuant to the people/common law, or operating pursuant to the person/legal law. It’s a wicked game.

U.S. Persons are game pieces, just like in Monopoly
U.S. Persons are game pieces, just like in Monopoly

There are two sides to the coin. You have both: a real man or woman; and you also have a token=U.S. Person, which is actually a trust account with your name on it, a pawn created by the de facto corp. masquerading as the United States de jure govt. When you agree to BE this trust account, you have agreed to allow the corp. dba the Govt. of the US of A to control you.

Since you can’t be on the board and off the board at the same time, you have to choose. If you choose to be a token and play on their board, you are at a disadvantage since they are speakin’ the rules, the laws, the juris-diction. They are serving YOU the notices, right? It’s all pursuant to common law. The Constitution is based on common law. There’s no such thing as federal common law in the district court, lower case d and c because we the people BRING OUR OWN LAW, called a Claim, or Affirmation. We bring our own REMEDY, too, called a Fee Schedule.

Therefore, at M4F, we feel the solution for sovereigns/sovrans/people is to speak OUR law, the Truth. We DO NOT CONSENT to “appearing” in their game. Instead, we bring a case in our own court, pursuant to the 7th Amendment and the common law. Then, we serve THEM notices demanding justification for their coercion and harassment. More here. Or that’s the theory, at least! Good luck bringing it about!

So, what the heck is a “sovereign citizen?” Did you know that the phrase “sovereign citizen” is not found in either the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence? In fact, the phrase cannot be found in any of the Organic Laws of America. Search and confirm this fact for yourself. Unfortunately, the link was taken down or moved. Check it out here. Many Sovereign Citizens refer often to a manual called Redemption Manual 4.5. In over 500 pages, you won’t find either of the words, “people,” or “citizen.” So, what are they talking about?

For accurate information about the topic of sovereignty in America, please check out this Policy Document on UCC Redemption from the Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry. I don’t always agree with SEDM, but you’ll find reasonably accurate and thorough research there.

However, the word, “people,” is found throughout this nation’s founding documents. This is why myself and others have concluded that this is the best word to use, currently, to describe the unique flesh and blood man or woman (besides these words, themselves) appearing subject to his or her common law court in “rerum natura,” who consents, (or chooses not to consent), to delegating his or her rights to a jurisdiction, thereby becoming a “citizen” of that jurisdiction.

In America, you delegate your rights to the corporate jurisdiction by agreeing to be the US PERSON, subject to statutes, rather than the real man or woman, subject to God, the people, and the common law. If you “appear” when you are called to the corporation’s statutory court, you have consented to their jurisdiction. Don’t be surprised if they treat you like a PERSON, their property. Don’t stand there and argue that you are a “sovereign!!”

Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven. Read more here. A sovereign only “appears” subject to a common law jurisdiction, which is subject only to God and the people. Therefore, the only court that a sovereign “appears” at would be his or her own common law court called for the purpose of suing someone who has violated his or her rights according to the terms of his or her Fee Schedule.

“All governments must maintain power through consent, not coercion.” Barack Obama, January 2011

We also like the word, “Freeman,“defined in the Magna Carta. Read more about our Unalienable Rights. Also, for an overview of just how complicated all of this can be to sort out, check this link.

Most agree there is a dual system between the states united under the Constitution, populated with PEOPLE, with authority directed from the BOTTOM UP, and the United States, headquartered in D.C., populated with U.S. CITIZENS = PERSONS, with authority directed from the TOP DOWN. Check out Do Not Consent: The Path to American Freedom.

All people have the right to be "people," and not corporations
All people have the right to be “people,” and not corporations

While myself and others, are of the opinion that the United States is a corporation operating in a similar manner to a PLANTATION, with owners and slaves., we are NOT members of the so-called “sovereign citizen movement!”

We share views in common with Sam Kennedy, Tim Turner, Winston Shrout, David Williams, and others in the so-called “restore the republic,” “sovereignty, and “freedom” movements, but we differ in some important aspects.

Sovereignty

mid-14c., “pre-eminence,” from Anglo-Fr. sovereynete, from O.Fr. souverainete, from soverain (see sovereign). Meaning “authority, rule” is recorded from late 14c.; sense of “existence as an independent state” is from 1715.

The U.S. Code, including the income tax system, is a voluntary system predicated upon “citizenship.” People have the right to choose not to “volunteer” to be a citizen; in other words, people who are made citizens by virtue of their birth on the land (or naturalization) and by virtue of the fact that they become “subject to” the jurisdiction of the U.S., via the birth certificate registration, have the right to “renounce” their corporate citizenship, at which point, they become “people,” with ALL UNALIENABLE rights restored as recognized in the Declaration of Independence and other founding documents.

“Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and voluntary compliance.” — Mortimer Caplin, former Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975).

What does is mean, “individual self-assessment?” It means that we, flesh and blood men and women, have the right to declare our independence from the system.

Barack Obama admits that we have the right to maintain that we do not consent, do not subject ourselves to, and  are not any of the following: persons, individuals, residents, citizens, etc.

We feel that the phrase, “Sovereign Citizen,” is an oxymoron, like Jumbo Shrimp. I don’t claim to be any kind of expert in the constitution! I’m a musician. But this guy, Alfred Adask,  is probably an expert! More of his work found here. Check out Freedom School in Texas. I like Bill Thornton. But my favorite source for the most accurate scholarship on these subjects is SEDM.

“…you were coerced, by fraud, to join a system of perversion created by power people, not the little people, way back in 1776. This assured the King would get his treaty wishes fulfilled by you being the credit of the United States and its political subdivisions called States. Therefore, being a citizen you can’t set up a trust with the land or property you pledged as credit.” The Informer

Michael Badnarik is known and loved in the freedom community for his expertise in this area, as is Edwin Vieira. Really, there are far too many great researchers to mention by name.

Clearly, the corporation is an occupying army, taking over this country, little by little.

Senate Document # 43; SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 62 (Pg 9, Para 2) April 17, 1933. “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership”is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”

No matter what you call it, great patriotic people from all over this nation are fighting with the same goal in mind: restoring the republic. Many are quite competent and creative. I hear that Rod Class is on top of things; find his work here. As Keynes, the author of central bankstering wrote: “…by this means, government may confiscate the wealth of the people and not one man in a million will detect the theft.”

Lieber Code, General Orders No. 100 by Abraham Lincoln (04/24/1863) Section II, Article 31: “A victorious army appropriates all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or that of its government all revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance during military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.”

That says it all for now…..peace, Ven

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. 3 Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent | Musicians for Freedom
  2. BLM and Globalist Mercenaries Steal Cliven Bundy’s Cattle | Musicians for Freedom
  3. Free Dr. Dino! Kent Hovind, a Political Prisoner? | Musicians for Freedom

Leave a Reply