July 2009 Articles

Support Legislation RE: Botched Plastic Surgery

9/11 Truth Activist to Sue Glenn Beck

9/11 Truth Activist to Sue Glenn Beck and Fox News for Defamation

Friday, June 12 2009

An East Coast 9/11 truth activist is preparing to file a defamation lawsuit against TV / radio personality, Glenn Beck, the producers of the Glenn Beck Program, and the Fox News Channel.

Specifically, Greg Hoover will be suing the above-described defendants in Federal Court for Beck’s having repeatedly broadcast statements characterizing those who question the government’s official version of the events of 9/11 as, “anarchists,” “terrorists” and as persons denying the Holocaust.

The complaint will note that – on October 22, 2007 – Beck suggested that those identifying themselves as associated with the 9/11 truth movement are “dangerous” “anarchists” who deny the Holocaust, and are “the kind of group that Timothy McVeigh would come from.”

Read Article

Opposing Zionism is Neither Anti-Semitic Nor Particularly Radical

OPINION: Zionism is the problem

The Zionist ideal of a Jewish state is keeping Israelis and Palestinians from living in peace.

By Ben Ehrenreich
March 15, 2009

It’s hard to imagine now, but in 1944, six years after Kristallnacht, Lessing J. Rosenwald, president of the American Council for Judaism, felt comfortable equating the Zionist ideal of Jewish statehood with “the concept of a racial state — the Hitlerian concept.” For most of the last century, a principled opposition to Zionism was a mainstream stance within American Judaism.

Even after the foundation of Israel, anti-Zionism was not a particularly heretical position. Assimilated Reform Jews like Rosenwald believed that Judaism should remain a matter of religious rather than political allegiance; the ultra-Orthodox saw Jewish statehood as an impious attempt to “push the hand of God”; and Marxist Jews — my grandparents among them — tended to see Zionism, and all nationalisms, as a distraction from the more essential struggle between classes.

To be Jewish, I was raised to believe, meant understanding oneself as a member of a tribe that over and over had been cast out, mistreated, slaughtered. Millenniums of oppression that preceded it did not entitle us to a homeland or a right to self-defense that superseded anyone else’s. If they offered us anything exceptional, it was a perspective on oppression and an obligation born of the prophetic tradition: to act on behalf of the oppressed and to cry out at the oppressor.

For the last several decades, though, it has been all but impossible to cry out against the Israeli state without being smeared as an anti-Semite, or worse. To question not just Israel’s actions, but the Zionist tenets on which the state is founded, has for too long been regarded an almost unspeakable blasphemy.

Read Article

In God’s Name (Animated)

My Chemical Romance/Watchmen

Colorado Prepares for Bio Terrorism

State prepares for bioterrorism
Executive orders give governor additional powers

By Jim Erickson,
Rocky Mountain News

February 8, 2003

The state of Colorado could seize antibiotics, cremate disease-ridden corpses
and, under extreme circumstances, dig mass graves under executive orders
drafted for use in the event of a bioterrorism attack.

Eight of the executive orders have been drafted since mid-2001 by the
Governor’s Expert Emergency Epidemic Response Committee.

The 19-member panel advises Gov. Bill Owens on measures to prevent or reduce
the spread of disease after a bioterrorism attack. It was formed in 2000 –
well before the Sept. 11 attacks and the anthrax scares – as part of a law that
laid out the Colorado governor’s powers during emergencies.Owens hasn’t signed
any of the draft executive orders yet, and there’s a good chance they’ll never
be needed, said Mark Estock, bioterrorism program coordinator at the state
health department.”We hope and pray that these cataclysmic events never come,”
Estock said.

The nightmare scenarios include planes flying over a stadium and releasing an
aerosolized germ, such as smallpox or plague, that infects thousands of people.

“But should they come, we’re going to be able to say to the citizens of Colorado,
‘We’re ready, and this is what we’re going to do.’ “Other states have requested
copies of Colorado’s orders to use as models, Estock said.

“They contacted us because they’ve heard we have a good statute in place, so I
think it’s fair to say that Colorado is looked to as a leader in bioterrorism
preparedness,” said Lt. Gov. Jane Norton. The former executive director of the
state health department chaired the epidemic-response committee until she took
over as lieutenant governor in January. Most of the eight draft executive
orders would temporarily suspend various state regulatory statutes so emergency
workers and health officials can act quickly after a bioterrorism event.

One draft order empowers the state to commandeer pharmaceuticals from
drugstores and warehouses after an attack.

The federal government would immediately send in antibiotics and other
medicines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National
Pharmaceutical Stockpile, but until that shipment arrived, Colorado health
workers would be forced to rely on local supplies.

“If it was the crop-duster-over-Coors Field scenario, we might want to get the
stuff right into the hands of the people going out to work with those patients,”
Estock said.

Three of the orders suspend licensing and pharmacy laws to allow emergency
responders to dispense drugs and immunize victims.

Another would allow hospital emergency rooms to close their doors to
bioterrorism victims when they reach capacity. Currently, federal law requires
hospitals to evaluate every patient who shows up at their emergency rooms.
After a bioterrorism or chemical attack, field decontamination and triage areas
might be set up near ground zero.

Victims would processed, sorted, then sent to assigned hospitals.

“In the event of an emergency, we may have to triage patients so they don’t
overwhelm the hospitals,” Estock said.

Under another draft executive order, mental health patients could be removed
from treatment facilities so their beds could be used by bioterrorism victims.
Another order would suspend statutes pertaining to death certificates and
burial practices.

“The funeral codes say that a dead body is to be handled by a funeral home and
that you must notify the next of kin and give preference to the religious
practices of the next of kin,” said Deputy Attorney General Renny Fagan, a
member of the governor’s advisory committee.

“But in a biological event or in a mass-casualty event, it may not be practical
to follow that law,” Fagan said.

Infected corpses might have to be isolated at temporary morgues to prevent the
spread of disease, Estock said. In certain situations, mass cremations or
burials might be required.

“I don’t want to come across as saying the state’s going to make this decision
to do mass cremations and ruin the lives of families. That’s certainly not the
intent,” Estock said. “But it (the executive order) just gives us maximum
flexibility.”

A ninth executive order, pertaining to quarantines, is being prepared.

State and local health officials already have statutory authority to quarantine
people with contagious diseases.

The draft executive order would extend those powers so they could be applied
“on a broader basis than usually occurs in public health,” Fagan said. Colorado
health officials will test their ability to respond to a bioterrorist event this summer in a statewide exercise, Estock said.

Read Article

Nuclear Power is the Problem, Not a Solution
Friday, April 15, 2005 by the Australian
by Helen Caldicott

There is a huge propaganda push by the nuclear industry to justify nuclear power as a panacea for the reduction of global-warming gases.
In fact Leslie Kemeny on these pages two weeks ago (HES, March 30) suggested that courses on nuclear science and engineering be included in tertiary level institutions in Australia.

I agree. But I would suggest that all the relevant facts be taught to students. Mandatory courses in medical schools should embrace the short and long-term biological, genetic and medical dangers associated with the nuclear fuel cycle. Business students should examine the true costs associated with the production of nuclear power. Engineering students should become familiar with the profound problems associated with the storage of long-lived radioactive waste, the human fallibilities that have created the most serious nuclear accidents in history and the ongoing history of near-misses and near-meltdowns in the industry.

At present there are 442 nuclear reactors in operation around the world. If, as the nuclear industry suggests, nuclear power were to replace fossil fuels on a large scale, it would be necessary to build 2000 large, 1000-megawatt reactors. Considering that no new nuclear plant has been ordered in the US since 1978, this proposal is less than practical. Furthermore, even if we decided today to replace all fossil-fuel-generated electricity with nuclear power, there would only be enough economically viable uranium to fuel the reactors for three to four years.

The true economies of the nuclear industry are never fully accounted for. The cost of uranium enrichment is subsidised by the US government. The true cost of the industry’s liability in the case of an accident in the US is estimated to be $US560billion ($726billion), but the industry pays only $US9.1billion – 98per cent of the insurance liability is covered by the US federal government. The cost of decommissioning all the existing US nuclear reactors is estimated to be $US33billion. These costs – plus the enormous expense involved in the storage of radioactive waste for a quarter of a million years – are not now included in the economic assessments of nuclear electricity.

It is said that nuclear power is emission-free. The truth is very different.

Read Article

Who is the Handicapper General?

In Kurt Vonnegut’s short story entitled: Harrison Bergeron – on which a 1972 screenplay, “Between Time & Timbuktu” was based – we are introduced to a world where human creativity and true equality are squashed in the name of fairness… “THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.”

One Song Each – Musical Performances

Make Room for RFID Chips?

Ex-IBM Employee reveals TV Abandoned Analog Band to Make Room for RFID Chips

Posted by sakerfa on July 12, 2009

According to a former 31-year IBM employee, the highly-publicized, mandatory switch from analog to digital television is mainly being done to free up analog frequencies and make room for scanners used to read implantable RFID microchips and track people and products throughout the world.

So while the American people, especially those in Texas and other busy border states, have been inundated lately with news reports advising them to hurry and get their expensive passports, “enhanced driver’s licenses,” passport cards and other “chipped” or otherwise trackable identification devices that they are being forced to own, this digital television/RFID connection has been hidden, according to Patrick Redmond.

Redmond, a Canadian, held a variety of jobs at IBM before retiring, including working in the company’s Toronto lab from 1992 to 2007, then in sales support. He has given talks, written a book and produced a DVD on the aggressive, growing use of passive, semi-passive and active RFID chips (Radio Frequency Identification Devices) implanted in new clothing, in items such as Gillette Fusion blades, and in countless other products that become one’s personal belongings. These RFID chips, many of which are as small, or smaller, than the tip of a sharp pencil, also are embedded in all new U.S. passports, some medical cards, a growing number of credit and debit cards and so on. More than two billion of them were sold in 2007.

Read Article

Alex Jones: Obama’s Pimp Game

Spools of Dark Thread w/ Uncle Nasty
Monty Python Classic!

The Devalued Prime Minister
Abortions and mass sterilization needed

John Holdren, Obama’s Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet

Book he authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A “Planetary Regime” with the power of life and death over American citizens.

The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?

These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology — informally known as the United States’ Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables) “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives — using an armed international police force.

Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. No one in their right mind would say such things.

Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed.

Read Article

The Obsolete Man

Did Nano-thermite take down the WTC?

The Coming Collapse of the Middle Class


The Real Agenda of the NWO
Zeitgeist & Lucis Trust #1
Zeitgeist & Lucis Trust #2
Are Americans Enemy Combatants?