August 2009 Featured Articles

Stop the Pass Act – S 1261!!

The Facts on Swine Flu


AUGUST 28, 2009

What are the symptoms of the new H1N1 swine flu virus?

Fever, cough, sore throat, runny or stuffy nose, body aches, headache, chills and fatigue. A significant number of people also report diarrhea and vomiting.

What is the difference between ordinary seasonal flu and a flu pandemic?

The symptoms are the same, but they can be much more severe with a pandemic, which affects younger, healthy people who don’t normally suffer as much from seasonal flu.

There are other differences:

– Seasonal flu happens every year, while a pandemic happens only two or three times a century.

– Seasonal flu is usually around from November to April; a flu pandemic can come in two or three waves, with each wave lasting about two months.

– About 10 per cent of Ontarians get seasonal flu each year; about 35 per cent of Ontarians could get flu during a pandemic.

– Most people who get seasonal flu recover within a few weeks; during a pandemic, more people who get the flu will recover more slowly.

– Seasonal flu is hardest on people who don’t have strong immune systems (the very young, the very old and people with certain chronic illnesses); anyone could become seriously ill with flu during a pandemic.

– In a normal flu season, up to 2,000 Ontarians die of flu-related complications such as pneumonia; during a pandemic, many more people could be infected, possibly leading to many more deaths.

How do I know if I have the H1N1 virus or seasonal flu?

Without laboratory testing, it’s difficult to know exactly what strain of flu a person has. Often, several strains of flu are circulating at the same time, and the symptoms are usually the same. And because health officials are no longer doing large-scale diagnostic tests to determine which types of flu people have, health-care providers are preparing this fall to assess and treat patients with all types of flu-like illness. Only flu patients who are hospitalized will continue to be tested for H1N1.

How long can an infected person spread the H1N1 virus to others?

People infected with seasonal flu and H1N1 flu can infect others from one day before showing symptoms to seven days afterward.

Who is at risk of developing complications from the H1N1 virus?

As with seasonal flu, certain people who get H1N1 are at “high risk” of serious complications. This includes children under two, pregnant women and people of any age with certain chronic illnesses. In Canada, about 75 per cent of people who have died from complications linked to H1N1 have had one or more medical conditions. These include pregnancy, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, asthma, kidney disease, suppressed immune systems and neurocognitive and neuromuscular disorders.

One thing that makes H1N1 appear different than seasonal flu is that people over 65 do not seem to be at increased risk of complications. Laboratory studies by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control have shown that about one-third of adults older than 60 may have antibodies against the H1N1 virus, while those under 60 do not. It’s not known how much, if any, protection these antibodies provide against H1N1 flu.

How does the new H1N1 flu compare to seasonal flu in severity and infection rates?

Like H1N1 flu, seasonal flu can cause mild to severe illness, and at times lead to death. According to the Ontario Ministry of Health, between three and six million Canadians get flu every year, and between 4,000 and 8,000 Canad-ians, mostly seniors, die from flu, pneumonia and other related complications. Of the estimated 60,000 who are hospitalized, the largest groups are children under two and people over 65. To date, statistics show that H1N1 flu has caused a greater disease burden in people under 25. Meanwhile, relatively few cases and deaths have been reported in people over 64, which is unusual when compared to the seasonal flu.

Read Article

DHS Sets Guidelines For Possible Swine Flu Quarantines

April 28, 2009 5:12 PM
Posted by Declan McCullagh

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has sent a memo to some health care providers noting procedures to be followed if the swine flu outbreak eventually makes quarantines necessary.

DHS Assistant Secretary Bridger McGaw circulated the swine flu memo, which was obtained by, on Monday night. It says: “The Department of Justice has established legal federal authorities pertaining to the implementation of a quarantine and enforcement. Under approval from HHS, the Surgeon General has the authority to issue quarantines.”

McGaw appears to have been referring to the section of federal law that allows the Surgeon General to detain and quarantine Americans “reasonably believed to be infected” with a communicable disease. A Centers for Disease Control official said on Tuesday that swine flu deaths in the U.S. are likely.

Federal quarantine authority is limited to diseases listed in presidential executive orders; President Bush added “novel” forms of influenza with the potential to create pandemics in Executive Order 13375. Anyone violating a quarantine order can be punished by a $250,000 fine and a one-year prison term.

A Homeland Security spokesman on Tuesday did not have an immediate response to followup questions about the memo, which said “DHS is consulting closely with the CDC to determine appropriate public health measures.”

The memo from McGaw, who is DHS’ acting assistant secretary for the private sector, also said: “U.S. Customs and Coast Guard Officers assist in the enforcement of quarantine orders. Other DOJ law enforcement agencies including the U.S. Marshals, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives may also enforce quarantines. Military personnel are not authorized to engage in enforcement.”

Quarantines are hardly new: their history stretches at least as far back as the Bible, which describes a seven-day period of isolation that priests must impose when an infection is apparent. The word literally means a period of 40 days, which cities along the Mediterranean shipping routes imposed during the plague of the 15th century, a legal authority reflected in English law and echoed in U.S. law.

Congress enacted the first federal quarantine law in 1796, which handed federal officials the authority to assist states in combating the yellow fever epidemic. In response to the 1918 influenza epidemic, states levied quarantines and imposed mask laws – with the District of Columbia restricting residents to their homes and San Francisco adopting the slogan “Wear a Mask and Save Your Life! A Mask is 99% Proof Against Influenza.” Public health authorities quarantined the entire campus of Syracuse University for two-and-a-half weeks in October of that year.

Until recently, the last involuntary quarantine in the United States was in 1963. Then, in 2007, Andrew Speaker, an Atlanta lawyer, was quarantined inside a hospital in Denver on suspicion of having extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. It turned out that the CDC was incorrect and Speaker had a milder form of the disease.

Read Article

Investigation Into 9/11 Yields New Information

August 27, 2009


By Craig Ranke Page 1 of 2 page(s)

For OpEdNews

Researchers present new eyewitness testimony which they say proves the government’s story to be a “monstrous lie”

A three year independent investigation into the September 11, 2001 attack on the Pentagon has yielded new eyewitness evidence which, according to the Southern California-based researchers who conducted the investigation, “conclusively (and unfortunately) establishes as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a military black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.”

They have compiled the most pertinent testimony into an 81 minute video presentation entitled National Security Alert, which has earned the respect and praise of a growing number of distinguished academics, journalists, writers, entertainers, pilots, and military personnel.

Read Article

Of Tea-Parties and Patriots: Liberty for Whom?

Of Tea-Parties and Patriots: Liberty for Whom? by Dave Strano
The IAS Blog

The following article was written and directed towards members of the “Liberty Movement,” participants in the Tea Parties and Town Hall meeting protests. It was originally intended to be handed out at Colorado gun shows, where anarchists have done counter-recruitment against the Minutemen:

Of Tea-Parties and Patriots:
Liberty for who?

As town hall meetings on health care become the targets for disruptive protest and a growing “pro-liberty” movement gains traction and headlines, a full analysis of the situations we are facing as white working class people and an analysis of the strategies of the new “pro-liberty” movement is necessary.

I am authoring this piece as a white working class male that comes from a military family background, and identifies to some extent as being a libertarian. This description of myself is important as it helps color the perspective I am writing from, as any differences in my background, race, or socio-economic status would ultimately change the entire nature of this essay.

This piece is also mainly directed at white working class people that are active within this new movement. The reasons for this are many, as will become obvious as this piece progresses.

Read Article

Obama as Zombie Comic

An Enemy of the State: Justin Raimondo

Here is the Justin Raimondo biography of Rothbard, which we had previously thought to be out of print. But the publisher has made it available again through special arrangement, as a way of meeting the demand from readers.
This is the first biography of one of the most interesting and controversial social theorists of our time. Rothbard was the founder of the libertarian movement, a radical free marketeer who came of age in the era of collectivism and fought all his life for individualism and laissez-faire against overwhelming odds.

The story of his life is at the same time a cavalcade of virtually all of the controversial events, ideas, and personalities of the latter part of the twentieth century.

The author of twenty-eight books and thousands of articles, Rothbard’s life goal was to found a science of liberty, a comprehensive libertarian system of social thought encompassing philosophy, ethics, economics, and history.

This book tells the story of the intellectual adventure that was Rothbard’s life, his relationship with the great libertarian economist and philosopher Ludwig von Mises, and his intellectual growth and development as an economist and a thinker.

While Rothbard’s contributions to the history of social thought are important, his life story is interesting in itself: against almost impossible odds he managed to singlehandedly create the libertarian movement out of thin air at a time when such ideas were considered completely outside the pale.

An Enemy of the State traces Rothbard’s ideological odyssey, from the Old Right of the Chicago Tribune and the “isolationist” America First Committee, to the conservative movement of the fifties and early sixties, to the New Left of the mid-sixties, and then on to the Libertarian Party and the post-Cold War return to his Old Right roots. Rothbard was that interesting combination, an intellectual system-builder and theorist who was also an intellectual street fighter, a scholar, and a man of action.

Anyone interested in the history of ideas, whether or not they agree with Rothbard’s ideology, is bound to be captivated by and drawn into the story of his fascinating life.

Justin Raimondo is a senior fellow at the Center for Libertarian Studies, editorial director of, and a longtime libertarian activist.

Lew Rockwell writes: “There will be other biographies forthcoming, but the success of this one will endure in many, many areas: it is energetic, well-researched, factual (the few mistakes have no bearing on the thesis), and achieves something of a balance between advocacy and pure biography. “Reading it, you can’t help but thrill at how this book will affect a new generation of readers, giving them a fresh perspective on post-war intellectual and political history and also inspiring them to radical thinking in defense of human liberty. Even if you have never heard of Murray Rothbard, you will be drawn to his life, his mind, his spirit. To understand his times and ours, you must have this book.”

400 page hardback.

Read Article

The Secret Right
Vacine Hazards You Should Know About

Vaccination Hazards

Many medical practitioners and researchers have broken away from the “medical mafia” with courageous efforts at disclosing the truth. But most others are still in denial, and sometimes even unethical. According to a June 4. 2009 London Times article, disclosures from several scientists have confirmed suspicions that many scientists within the medical research community fudge reports by omitting detrimental facts or even faking data to obtain conclusions that satisfy their sponsors.

Here are some comments from just a few of those courageous medical experts with integrity. More comments from other experts can be reviewed via the source links or urls.

Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD, author of Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills among other books, suggests that a single vaccine can cause brain damage for two years and five vaccinations would massively increase the risk of Alzheimer’s Disease.

Dr. Len Horowitz, a most thorough medical investigator states, “Casually substituting vaccination for immunization mystifies the masses. Immunization is not man-made toxin-injection. It is the natural body-guarding response to foreign proteins and germs, the most lethal of which have been transmitted to humanity through contaminated vaccines and blood supplies.”

Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health declared, “. . . the only safe vaccine is one that is never used.”

In his article Why You Should Avoid Taking Vaccines, Dr. James Howenstine, MD, cites an episode where a Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 19 hours of a DPT immunization. Then he studied 70 cases of SIDS. Two thirds of these victims had been vaccinated from one half day to 3 weeks prior to their deaths. None were attributed to vaccines by the medical establishment or the mass media.

From Dr. Boyd Haley, professor and chair, Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky: “A single vaccine given to a six pound newborn is the equivalent of giving a 180 pound adult 30 vaccinations on the same day.” “You couldn’t construct a study to show that thimerosal (mercury in vaccines) is safe. It’s just too damn toxic”.

From a website promotion for a DVD entitled Shoot ‘Em Up the Documentary, comes this information. “Did you know that we give children 23 viruses before they reach the age of 5? Did you know autism skyrocketed after the addition of more vaccines on the mandatory schedule and did you know that these vaccines contain thimerosal, which is ethyl mercury?” By the way, mercury is considered more toxic than lead and second in toxicity only to uranium.

Most vaccines are cocktails of pathogens from cultures derived from aborted fetuses or animal tissues. Thimerersol or ethyl mercury is not the only additive or preservative. Dr. Rima E. Laibow, MD, lists the ingredients common to vaccines, with some of her own comments, including, “If children receive all recommended vaccines, they will receive many times the supposed ‘allowable safe limit’ for mercury in the first two years of life.

Additional ingredients include antibiotics, aluminum gels, formaldehyde, monosodium glutamate (MSG), aluminum “which when combined with silicon deficiency and fluoride, results in the neurofibrillary tangles seen in Alzheimers disease, formaldehyde, MSG,” a potent neurological excitotoxin which, like aspartame, can cause seizures, brain tumors, etc.

Dr. Rima goes on: “Squalene, a response enhancer or adjuvant, is present in many modern vaccines and is highly irritating to the immune system. . . . (used in) Anthrax vaccine in Gulf War I soldiers is believed by many to be a primary cause, along with depleted uranium, of the devastating condition known as Gulf War Syndrome”.

Read Article

Sons of Liberty: Patriots or Terrorists?

Sons of Liberty:
Patriots or Terrorists?
How A Secret Society of Rebel Americans
Made Its Mark on Early America

by Todd Alan Kreamer

SONS OF LIBERTY, or Sons of something altogether different? I suppose it all depends on a particular individual’s point of view.

For the American “armchair historian,” this American Revolutionary organization conjures up a myriad of confusing images. But, what of this “secret” organization that played such an integral part in advancing the idea of American independence from Great Britain? What were the Sons of Liberty? Who were its members and how widespread was its support among the thirteen colonies comprising British America? What was the ideology and degree of political affiliation within the organization?

Shrouded in secrecy, the origins of the Sons of Liberty are in dispute. Some historical sources claim that the movement began in New York City in January 1765. A more popular claim is that the movement began in Boston, Massachusetts through the leadership of one Samuel Adams (a well known American Revolutionary firebrand) in early 1765. It is quite likely that the Boston and New York City chapters of the Sons of Liberty were organized and developed simultaneously.

Tradition has it that the Boston chapter gathered beneath the Liberty Tree for meetings while the New York City chapter met beneath the Liberty Pole for its meetings. For reasons of safety and secrecy, Sons of Liberty groups tended to meet late at night so as not to attract attention and detection of British officials and the American Loyalist supporters of the British Crown.

Read Article

Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals

By Craig Miyamoto, APR, Fellow PRSA

(This is an expanded version of the 2000 Third Quarter issue of Public Relations Strategies, a quarterly publication of Miyamoto Strategic Counsel)

To paraphrase some sage advice, “keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer.” If your business or organization ever becomes a target of radical activists, it will be extremely helpful to know what strategies of attack will used against you. Short of having spies infiltrate their organization – a practice that is sure to be found out and exposed to your discredit – it would help to study their methods.

Known as the “father of modern American radicalism,” Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) developed strategies and tactics that take the enormous, unfocused emotional energy of grassroots groups and transform it into effective anti-government and anti-corporate activism. Activist organizations teach his ideas widely taught today as a set of model behaviors, and they use these principles to create an emotional commitment to victory – no matter what.

Grassroots pressure on large organizations is reality, and there is every indication that it will grow. Because the conflicts manifest in high-profile public debate and often-panicked decision-making, studying Alinsky’s rules will help organizations develop counteractive strategies that can level the playing field.

Governments and corporations have inherent weaknesses. And, time and again, they repeat mistakes that other large organizations have made, even repeating their OWN mistakes. Alinsky’s out-of-print book – “Rules for Radicals” – illustrates why opposition groups take on large organizations with utter glee, and why these governments and corporations fail to win.

Large organizations have learned to stonewall and not empower activists. In other words, they try to ignore radical activists and are never as committed to victory as their opposition is committed to defeating them. Result? They are unprepared for the hailstorm of brutal tactics that severely damage their reputation and send them running with their tails between their legs.

Some of these rules are ruthless, but they work. Here are the rules to be aware of:

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

Read Article

State of Shock : Poems from 9/11
By Jerry Mazza
State of Shock : Poems from 9/11

This book is a 132 page work written by Jerry Mazza and published by Authorhouse with an ISBN13 of 9781438906973 and an ISBN10 of 1438906978.

State of Shock : Poems from 9/11 expresses the emotional impact of 9/11 and the resulting Iraq and Afghanistan wars on the American psyche. These narrative and lyrical poems are a call for help and reaction to the dangers facing our country.

With bold images and rhythmic intensity, poet and journalist Jerry Mazza confronts this danger head-on. His poems suggest that an operation of the magnitude of 9/11 was not the work of 19 Islamic “terrorists” but the machinations of key members of our own ruling elite to start “The War on Terror” in a grasp for Mid-Eastern oil and power.

Mazza concludes that 9/11 constituted a form of coup d’etat for the Bush administration, the purpose to gain excessive powers for war-making and appropriations as well as for controlling civil dissent.

As Daniel Estulin, author of the international best-seller, The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, writes in his forward to Mazza’s State Of Shock…

“…I keep reminding myself that the pages of this book are a re-vindication of decency at the expense of cruelty and chance. For me, the main theme is not political nor is it an outspoken criticism of totalitarianism but rather the beating of a Man’s loving heart—and it is for the sake of this theme that it should be read…”

Jerry Mazza is a lifelong resident of New York City and lives several miles upstream of Ground Zero. In addition to his poetry, he has published hundreds of articles on politics and government as an Associate Editor at

Additional copies of this book can be bought at

An Insider Explains Elite Plan

Vaccines, Abortion & Fetal Tissue

From Right to Life of Michigan

For several years now, information has circulated among prolife groups and individuals regarding the development of very common vaccines through the use of tissue taken from aborted babies. While initially the reports and information were not conclusively documented, further detailed research by several prolife groups has provided direct proof of a connection between aborted fetal tissue and most vaccines. That connection, and its implications for whether prolife citizens should consider using the vaccines, raises some complicated issues. In sorting through those issues, this LifeNotes will address the basic science involved, the documentation of the abortion-vaccine connection, the moral/ethical questions about using abortion-tainted vaccines, and information about available alternative vaccines.

Basic Vaccine and Cell Line Science
The vaccine process works by collecting samples of the actual virus, then growing and altering them in the laboratory to make a weakened strain of the disease. That weakened strain is put into a serum and administered into the body (usually by injection). The body’s immune system is more capable of naturally attacking and destroying the weakened virus, and thus develops the ability to effectively fight off the actual disease should the person ever be exposed to it. The advent of vaccines was a major milestone in medicine, saving millions of lives and saving many others from the devastating effects of diseases like polio.

In order to develop the weakened viral strain, there must be a medium or “cell culture” to grow it in. The virus invades the culture cells, feeds off the cell, matures, and multiplies. The cell cultures are a single type of cell that multiplies itself in a predictable fashion and can be sustained in a laboratory setting for years, even decades. These long-lasting cell cultures are called “cell lines.” The original cells that start these cell lines have been taken from a wide variety of sources, from monkey embryo and kidney cells, to chicken and rabbit embryos, and tragically, from aborted human babies. The issue of concern is that many common vaccines were developed using cell lines that originally were cells taken from electively aborted babies. The vaccines themselves do not contain fetal cells, but it is presumed that there is “residual” biological matter from the fetal cells that has been assimilated into the vaccine

Read Article

In Theory TV: Damn the Torpedoes!

Obama’s Mother-In-Law Practicing Voodoo?

August 17, 2009

Kristen Atkinson, a blogger over at the Townhall website, has posted an article claiming Marian Robinson, the 72-year old first grandmother who lives at the White House, is practicing Santería, otherwise known as voodoo. A close friend of Michelle Obama says the president became furious at his mother-in-law.

Obama may be outraged by a voodoo priestess chanting in the White House, but paganism at the highest levels of government is nothing new.

According to Atkinson, Marian Robinson became increasingly frustrated as her husband, Fraser Robinson, was hobbled by multiple sclerosis in the late 1980s, and turned to “Santeria in a desperate hope” to cure him. “Michelle put her foot down when she heard that her mother took her dad to ceremonies where they did spells and trances, and sacrificed animals, chickens and goats I think. But Marian was desperate and kept going anyway, even when her husband was to sick to go with her. I don’t think the president knew anything about this earlier because it was before they met. Michelle and Craig (her brother) wanted to close the book on this and never talked about it again after their father died in 1991.”

Robinson, concerned about her failing health, invited an old friend from Chicago to visit her at the White House and the friend performed a Santeria ceremony in the residence. “No voodoo in the White House. Absolutely. I don’t care what you call it,” Obama allegedly declared.

Obama may be outraged by a voodoo priestess chanting in the White House, but paganism at the highest levels of government is nothing new or particularly shocking.

The global elite pulling Obama’s strings are dedicated paganists and their religion is based on the mystery school religions of Sumer and Babylon. “Most modern human beings are convinced that … pagan gods passed into the dustbin of history two millenia ago, but we suspect that this may not be the case. Repeatedly throughout history, the elites of the Great World Empire have been attracted to religious secret societies such as these, which maintain a high regard for the ancient pagans,” write Jerry Russell and Richard Stanley.
A prime example of the global elite’s obsession with the mystery school religions is the Bohemian Grove ritual, where the hand-picked minions of the elite — 1,500 of America’s most influential CEOs, government officials, financiers, industrialists, and media moguls — worship a giant 40-foot owl and sacrifice a mock human being in effigy they call Dull Care. Members include former presidents George W. Bush, his father, Henry Kissinger, and David Rockefeller.

For more on Bohemian Grove and the elite, see the Prison Planet archive.

Another example is Skull and Bones, aka The Order of Death, a secret society that has George W. Bush and John Kerry as members. Skull and Bones features bizarre occult initiation rituals and an obsession with death. Numerous Bonesmen can be traced to positions of enormous influence, including the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, captains of industry, and all branches of the establishment. The secretive gathering at Bohemian Grove is an off-shoot of Skull and Bones.

The British press has exposed the occult activities of Cherie Blair and her famous husband, Tony Blair, the former prime minister. In 2004 the London Times reported on the fact that Tony Blair had made political decisions based on new age readings. “Among the milder activities Cherie Blair is said to have taken jars of her own and her husband’s hair and nail clippings to health guru who ‘dowsed’ the jars by waving a pendulum over them to detect ‘poisons and blockages’ that could affect the Blairs,” Steve Watson wrote for Prison Planet on September 21, 2005.

“This all sounds bizarre and incredible, you couldn’t make it up. Yet we have seen again and again how elite figures are obsessed with these kinds of activities,” Watson comments. “It seems that with absolute power comes an urge to tap into the dark side of humanity and any kind of underworld that lies beyond. It is therefore not surprising that our so called leaders and decision makers that have led us into a period of intense conflict and disharmony around the world are the same people who pander to and in many cases engage in such dark occult activities.”

It is also not surprising that Obama’s mother-in-law paraded around the White House with a voodoo priestess, although this may not have anything to do with the elite’s obsession with mystery religions, the occult, secret societies, and The Order of Death.

However, it is suspicious that Obama carries around “charms,” as documented by Time Magazine. One of Obama’s charms happens to be an image of Hanuman, as known as Bajrang Bali, the monkey god and one of the most revered gods in the Hindu religion, the largest pagan religion in the world.

Isn’t it strange that Obama, described ad nauseam as a Christian, would carry around a pagan idol?

Read Article

Can We Afford Another Broke Program

HR3200: The problem with the public option is that our government cannot run any program successfully.
BY DANIEL AT 18 AUGUST, 2009, 12:46 AM

Social Security is broke, Medicare is broke, Medicaid is broke, the government is broke. And they want to run health care??? So we can look forward to another broke program with severe rationing of health care services.

HR 3200 is an attempt to force everyone into a socialized health care system whereby they will ration out consumption of health care services. Old people will suffer the most as they will always be at the back of the long line. They are considered “non-productive” people, therefore they get less attention. And the government does all of this to provide free medical services to illegal immigrants, non-working citizens, etc. It’s not right, but that’s the way socialized medicine works. I have been a practicing nurse for many years and i have never seen anything posted about the number of illegals crowding the ER in any hospital in the country for free health care they cant be turned down even for such things as sore throats, ant bites and toothaches these are non emergency items that cost a fortune and cause any hospital to hemorage money like a fire hose What happened to immigration reform?

Read Article

Mike & the Mechanics: Silent Running

Silent Running
Mike and the Mechanics

Take the children and yourself
And hide out in the cellar
By now the fighting will be close at hand
Don’t believe the church and state
And everything they tell you
Believe in me, I’m with the high command

Can you hear me, can you hear me running?
Can you hear me running, can you hear me calling you?

There’s a gun and ammunition
Just inside the doorway
Use it only in emergency
Better you should pray to God
The Father and the Spirit
Will guide you and protect from up here

Can you hear me, can you hear me running?
Can you hear me running, can you hear me calling you?
Can you hear me, can you hear me running?
Can you hear me running, can you hear me calling you?

Swear allegiance to the flag
Whatever flag they offer
Never hint at what you really feel
Teach the children quietly
For some day sons and daughters
Will rise up and fight while we stood still

Steve Quayle with George Noory

Society is a Blessing, But Government is Evil
By Thomas Paine

A great part of that order which reigns among mankind is not the effect of government. It had its origin in the principles of society, and the natural constitution of man. It existed prior to government, and would exist if the formality of government was abolished. The mutual dependence and reciprocal interest which man has in man and all the parts of a civilized community upon each other create that great chain of connection which holds it together.

The landholder, the farmer, the manufacturer, the merchant, the tradesman, and every occupation prospers by the aid which each receives from the other, and from the whole. Common interest regulates their concerns, and forms their laws; and the laws which common usage ordains, have a greater influence than the laws of government. In fine, society performs for itself almost everything that is ascribed to government.

To understand the nature and quantity of government proper for man it is necessary to attend to his character. As nature created him for social life, she fitted him for the station she intended. In all cases she made his natural wants greater than his individual powers. No one man is capable, without the aid of society, of supplying his own wants; and those wants acting upon every individual impel the whole of them into society, as naturally as gravitation acts to a center.

But she has gone further. She has not only forced man into society by a diversity of wants, which the reciprocal aid of social affections, which, though not necessary to his existence, are essential to his happiness. There is no period in life when this love for society ceases to act. It begins and ends with our being.

Read Article


Trece The Light Video

National Emergency Video

Ridley Scott To Direct Alien Prequel

Ridley Scott To Direct Alien Prequel
July 31, 2009

Ridley Scott stands ready and willing to direct a prequel to his 1979 sci-fi epic Alien. The untitled project got a kick-start this week after writer-on-a-roll Jon Spaights pitched his concept to 20th Century Fox and the British director’s Scott Free production company.

Though none of his movies have yet been released, Spaights has become one of Hollywood’s hottest sci-fi writers over the past few months. Variety reports that Keanu Reeves stars in the Spaights-scripted Shadow 19. The Matrix actor also appears in Spaight’s outer-space adventure Passengers. Additionally Spaights is rewriting The Darkest Hour for producer Timur Bekmambetov (Wanted) and plans to work on screenplays for Children of Mars and a movie version of the St. George and the Dragon legend, according to the trade publication.

Though Scott’s hands-on involvement in an Alien prequel is encouraging, we’re not entirely convinced that it’s a good idea to tinker with a classic franchise. Do you want to see another Alien movie?

Read Article