Vengeancia Our first live event was held Sat., July 15, 2017, 2 – 10 PM at The Bug Theater. We had such a great time featuring the SERIOUSLY amazing films, photos, music videos and screenplays (we are not worthy…bow, scrape!) that we’re soliciting content, judges, panelists, sponsors and volunteers again for not one, but TWO upcoming film festivals in 2018! Read more, Infinite Perimeter Films.
Our first festival accepted donations at the door and in advance by snail mail/online. Entry vouchers/tickets were also made available in advance, which were redeemed prior to the start of the festival and at the door. Learn more, TEXT: (720) 298-1524.
Here are the types of films we are looking for, in general. We like documentary-style narratives & comedy, but we LOVE fictional narratives, re-enactments and dramatizations. To get a better idea, you can browse the selection over at Films for Action and at Top Documentary Films. Submission topics include Arts/Artists, Conspiracy, Comedy, Crime, Drugs, Economics, Environment, Filmmaking, Health, History, Media, Military & War, Music, Mystery, Nature, Philosophy, Politics, Psychology, Religion, Science, Sexuality, Society (generally), Sports, Technology. Really….we are interested in just about everything that presents thought-provoking, positive messages of interest to all sentient beings!
More than 300,000 filmmakers, writers and artists use FilmFreeway to submit to over 4,500 of the world’s best film festivals and contests (including 37 Oscar-qualifying festivals). Best of all, FilmFreeway is always 100% free for submitters. With FilmFreeway, activists always retain 100% of their rights to their intellectual property. Activists submit their screenplays, shorts, feature-length films, scripts, photos, and music projects entirely online. FilmFreeway online screeners play seamlessly, in beautiful, crystal-clear HD quality. Videos can be streamed securely in HD for review and judging purposes.
Activists submit short (and feature-length) films, screenplays, music videos, art/photography for consideration by the CIAFF team. The regular submission fee is $40.00 for the first submission and $10.00 for additional submissions in all categories. We also want to invite folks to volunteer to review submissions and work the actual event. TEXT: (720) 298-1524. Read more.
Featured on Channel 12 KBDI/Denver – “September 11, 2001 marked one of the most tragic days in American history. Fifteen years later, the events of that day continue to have a visceral and even traumatic impact on many Americans. Additionally, millions of Americans and citizens around the world question the official account of that day…”
Demolition of Truth: Psychologists Speak Out (2016) presents testimony and commentary from highly credentialed scientists, engineers, and military experts, including Dr. Robert Bowman, Dr. Lynn Margulis, Major General Albert Stubblebine, Dr. Neils Harrit, and many more. This expert testimony is woven with analyses by social scientists like David Ray Griffin, Fran Shure, Robert Griffin, Marti and Robert Hopper, Dorothy Lorig, Prof. William Woodward, Danielle Duperret and John Freedom who examine the psychological impact of 9/11 and the phenomena that have kept us blinded to truths too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves.
The film concludes with steps we can take, individually and collectively, toward healing. An epilogue by actor Ed Asner summarizes these analyses, emphasizing the role played by mainstream media that, lamentably, parrot their government sources rather than question them. Read more and more.
Our premiere film festival this year also featured music videos from Featured Musicians Jordan Page and Neal Fox. Check out Neal’s amazing production, The Conspiracy Project. Guess what!? You can sign up for Neal’s Newsletter and get absolutely nothing for FREE!…Such a deal! It’s here.
Films for Action Just imagine what could become possible if an entire city had seen just one of the documentaries above. Just imagine what would be possible if everyone in the country was aware of how unhealthy the mainstream media was for our future and started turning to independent sources in droves….The old story of empire and dominion over the earth has to be looked at in the full light of day – all of our ambient cultural stories and values that we take for granted and which remain invisible must become visible.
But most of all, we need to see the promise of the alternatives – we need to be able to imagine new exciting ways that people could live, better than anything that the old paradigm could ever dream of providing.
And all of this knowledge and introspection, dreaming, questioning, and discovery is essential for a cultural transformation that addresses root causes. This knowledge is vitally necessary. Taken together, this knowledge, which is documented throughout the 500+ documentaries on the Films For Action website, will lay the foundation on which the next paradigm will be built, post empire…read more, Films for Action.
“DOJ recently scrapped the old Bush-era stars and stripes website banner in favor of a more somber look, prompting lots of online conservative angst about the Obama administration’s lack of patriotism. But it wasn’t just the flag replacement that has conservatives atwitter. It’s the quote that now graces the top of the page, which says, ‘The common law is the will of mankind issuing from the life of the people.'” Read more about the DOJ’s Marxist Web Makeover, Mother Jones.
“…After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud…Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” Attributed to Colonel Edward Mandell House.
Check out non-voting at Strike the Root. Seriously, how can anyone be “fully-informed” and presumed to consent when we don’t speak the same language as these MACHINES? “…if a person makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to any interest in property, this subtitle shall apply with respect to such interest as if the interest had never been transferred to such person…” 26 U.S. Code 2518 …I mean….WHAA?
“The president is the Chief Executive Officer of this corporation called the United States of America….” Congressman Allen West
“An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.” IRS manual 126.96.36.199.2.2
What? What does that mean, do you think? Who died? Me? You? Alfred Adask wants to know, too! Who(hu) is our EVIL TWIN? Here’s a link to his article. Since we’re on the topic of trust – or the lack of it in current times-here’s an interesting and informative video from my good friend Kurt; also here’s more, Kurt Kallenbach, This video is titled, Born Alive Certificated Person, followed by an excerpt from an article on trusts…Check it out…
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” In Congress, July 4, 1776, a declaration by the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled. Philadelphia: John Dunlap, July 4, 1776.
“All Governments Must Maintain Power through Consent, Not Coercion.” Barack Obama
Check out this blurb: “In addition to complying with the requirements of certainty and statutory formality, in order to create a valid trust there is a third requirement that the trust must be ‘completely constituted’. This requirement concerns the vest of the trust property in the trustees. A trust is completely constituted when the trust property is vested in one or more of the trustees for the benefit of the beneficiaries.” Constitution of a Trust, here. Here’s more on the topic of trusts….
Wealth Management by Guernsey For a trust to be valid, it requires the coincidence of three conditions which are known as “the three certainties”. If any of these conditions are absent then the trust will be void ab initio, form the very start. The proposition of the three certainties is taken from the dictum of Lord Langdale in the leading case Knight v Knight 1 :
1. Certainty Of Words Or Intention
The Settlor must have shown to have intended to create a trust before the court will hold that one has been created. No particular form of words is needed and it is not even necessary to use the word “trust”. Similarly, there is no actual requirement for the trust to be in writing, but it would be a brave trustee not to have at least some evidence of his appointment.
The words used must show that the obligation on the alleged trustees is sufficiently imperative as to amount to a trust. In the 18 th and 19 th centuries, the English Court of Chancery (now replaced by a division of the High Court) was prepared to accept precatory words. Words in the will or deed expressing the donor’s wish, hope, desire or confidence that the donee should deal with the property in a particular way.
The attitude of the Court changed in 1871 in the Court of Appeal decision in Lambe v Eames . The Testator had left his estate to his widow, “to be at her disposal in any way she may think best, for the benefit of herself and her family” The Court held that the gift was an absolute gift to the widow and not a trust.
The Leading case supporting this position and establishing the accepted position in relation to the use of words was Re Adams and The Kensington Vestry. In this case the testator left his estate “unto and to the absolute use of my wife…… in full confidence that she will do what is right as to the disposal thereof between my children, either in her lifetime or by will after her decease”. The Court of Appeal held the gift to be absolute, Cotton LJ added:
Importantly, the courts will consider the whole context of the case to determine whether a trust has been created. This is to avoid as far as possible the frustration of the testator(ix) or settlor’s wishes. If there is insufficient certainty of intention then the gift takes effect as an absolute gift and no trust will be held to exist.
2. Certainty Of Subject-Matter
There are two aspects to this requirement: 1. There must be certainty as to what property is to be held upon trust; and 2. there must be certainty as to the extent of the beneficial interest of each beneficiary.
The first is essential as a trustee must know exactly what is and what is not included within the trust. A failure to deal with the property that belongs to the trust appropriately may result in a breach of trust.
For example, if the trust is declared of “Blackacre” being a property owned by the settlor or “£100,000” then the requirement is satisfied as these are readily identifiable. However, see Palmer v Simmonds where the Settlor declared that the assets were to be “the bulk of his estate”. The trust failed for uncertainty.
The beneficial interest of each beneficiary must be certain so that the trustees know exactly what or how much each beneficiary will be entitled to on distribution of the trust and prior to that, what income should be accumulated for or paid to the beneficiary.
In Boyce v Boyce a trust failed for uncertainty as to beneficial interest where a testator left several houses on trust for his wife for life and on her death to convey any one house to his daughter A, as she might choose and the remaining houses to his daughter B. A died before she could make a choice; this left uncertainty as to what particular house B should receive, so the trust for B was void.
Note however, where the Court can make an interpretation as to the testators or settlor’s intentions they will seek to do so, as in Re Golay where a trust was created providing ” a reasonable income” from certain properties, the Court was able to determine what a reasonable income was.
Note there will be no uncertainty in the following cases:
1. Where the trustees have a discretion as to what each beneficiary should receive in the case of a discretionary trust.
2. Where the trust does not refer to the beneficial interest of the beneficiaries and where it is possible to apply the maxim “equity is equality” and divide the trust equally between the beneficiaries.
3. Where the Settlor declares a trust in respect of an identified bank account, which unknown to the Settlor is subsequently changed in form, i.e. from a cheque account to a deposit account.
4. Where the Settlor declares, say for example, 5% of the shares in a company, X when for example he holds 950 out of the 1,000 issued shares, the Court will seek to identify the 50 shares to be held on trust.
Again, if uncertainty persists, the gift will be absolute.
3. Certainty of Objects
It is essential that the beneficiaries under a trust should be clearly defined or that a formula exists which enables the trustees to ascertain them. If a trustee makes a distribution to non-objects, then they may be held personally liable to replace the assets.
There are different tests for certainty of objects in fixed and discretionary trusts.
This excellent article about trusts continues… article. Also, more resources to educate yourself: 1. great freedom-filled online magazines, 2. Ernie Hancock, Freedoms Phoenix interviews Susanne Trimbath, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer, STP Advisory Services, LLC, about the Depository Trust Clearing Corporation (DTCC) – Find more interviews with her here.
Whew! There’s a lot to learn about protecting our God-given unalienable rights, which are (allegedly) also constitutionally-protected! Learn more, USAvsUS.info.
All of us at Musicians4Freedom look forward to helping you express yourself boldly and creatively!