Vengeancia (updated April 2015) “Institutions in the United States are not meant to be owned by those who lead them. They are not possessions to be disposed of according to the will and inclination of managers or governors. Leaders are custodians who supposedly act in the collective interest of all those who have a stake in the institution’s performance.”
Michael Brenner is Senior Fellow, the Center for Transatlantic Relations; Professor of International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh. This post is inspired by an article published originally at the Huffington Post.
Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson: “…soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging…” Read more, below. Also, read more. Read more about Woodrow Wilson.
Also check out Ben Bernanke and the Wisdom of Parasites, here. For background, read All Wars are Bankers’ Wars by Michael Rivero, here. Check out USA vs. US. Check out these videos. Learn more here and here. Read this. Listen to Peter’s 03/01/2014 In the Spirit of Things broadcast at I am Free Will blogtalk, here. Also, check out Peter’s video on Claiming the Divine Proportion, embedded below. Here’s the latest information from Kurt Kallenbach, and MP3. Also, check out Cynthia’s website. James Cox’ videos. Larken Rose videos. Check out Mass Mind Control, Larken’s recent presentation. James Sevan Bomar, videos.
Michael Brenner’s article continues….. “The principle holds for public bodies, for private entities certified, charted or endorsed by the government, and indeed any organization whose purposes and modes of operation are stipulated in an enabling constitution or a basic set of rules. This conforms to norms and legal traditions of liberally constituted societies.
“Consequently, it follows that office-holders, directors and managers are authorized to exercise their proper powers within a set of constraints. Empowerment together with accompanying limitations are designed to ensure that the functions of leadership are performed in a responsible manner. It is a fiduciary responsibility in a broad sense. Custodianship is a concept applicable to government offices, public agencies of all kinds, incorporated businesses, colleges and universities, even rule-bound social associations.
“Custodianship in concept and practice is the antithesis to autocracy, to rule by diktat. Yet, today we observe the abuse of power in arbitrary action on a growing scale. It is coming to challenge traditional norms of institutional authority nearly everywhere. Most noteworthy is the conduct of high public officials who see no obligation to explain or justify why and how they do things that drastically affect the general welfare. That disdain often is accompanied by deceit and outright lying, lying whose eventual revelation evokes a shrug of the proverbial shoulders rather than a mea culpa or repentance. The examples are legion.
Washington “Start with the wars launched under the aegis of the Global War On Terror. The invasion and occupation of Iraq was a signal event insofar as it was masked in a wrapping of untruths and fabrications from beginning to ignominious end.
“The invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, after the initial military action to dislodge al-Qaeda and unseat the Taliban, has been pressed without any cogent, reasoned argument in its defense whatsoever – other than the incantation of ‘The Evil One’ (terror) as the omnipresent mortal threat. More recently, the Obama White House has cavalierly overridden its solemn pledges to end the United States’ combat role there by the end of 2014 while implacably, publicly demanding of Kabul that we receive permission to stay on and prosecute the war for another 10 years – at least.
“The most stunning feature of this behavior is the unstated belief of our masters that they possess the intrinsic authority to do these things. The government, its policies, the country somehow are theirs to use as they see fit. ‘We the people’ get their say at election time; otherwise the citizenry are identified as the lobbyists and media who are to be cajoled or spun or appeased so as to secure leaders’ expansive prerogatives. That is the extent of the perceived commitment to a democratic polity and an informed citizenry.
“Yes, there is constant reference to a national ‘conversation’ on this, that or the other thing. But two-way communication of a serious nature habitually is avoided. Thus, President Obama promised a full and frank debate on electronic surveillance in response to the Snowden revelations. In the ensuing seven months, he has evaded addressing the subject except to repeat a vague series of platitudes and pledges, decorated by a couple of cosmetic touch-ups, that are contradicted almost weekly by new disclosures. So it was with Guantanamo, torture and rendition under the Bush administration.
“A feature of the White House’s mode of formulating the surveillance question is the reiterated claim that “security must be balanced against civil liberties.” Thus stated, the formula in effect affirms that government actions which violate privacy need only meet a standard of practical value in supposedly reducing some arbitrarily assessed security risk. But these are not considerations of the same order. The one is an explicit, constitutionally grounded right of citizens. The other is a subjective policy judgment based on a loose reading of inherently ambiguous legislation.
“The blurring of this fundamental distinction serves to expand radically the range of discretionary action by rulers while subordinating a principle inscribed in the Constitution for the very purpose of circumscribing that claimed prerogative. The Obama administration’s systematic resistance to having the constitutional issues adjudicated in the courts is, in effect, a declaration that it ‘possesses’ not only the executive branch but the United States governmental system itself.
“In today’s political culture, acts of malfeasance or non-feasance by leaders carry with them no obligation to accept responsibility to justify or to make restitution of any sort. It is the fickle winds of an unfocused media who can neither concentrate nor offer informed judgment that determine whether there will be any measure of accountability. Normally, there is little if any.
“A pernicious side effect of the assertion of arbitrary right in lieu of law is to embolden persons in positions of power to act in similar fashion. So we now see sheriffs in Colorado and upstate New York boldly declaring that they will not enforce those states’ gun laws. The justification is an assumed right to decide what constitutes a proper claim on their obedience as law enforcement agents. This is the exact logic laid out by Attorney General Eric Holder in testifying before Congress that he will decide whether to prosecute banks in accordance with the law depending on his personal assessment as to what economic damage such a prosecution may cause. Arbitrariness and anarchy are two sides of the same coin.
Wall Street “These same behavioral patterns are on equally vivid display by the heads of non-governmental institutions. In the financial realm, one need only think of the audacious reaction of the Wall Street barons to the near-death experience they inflicted on the economy. To this day, not a single figure of note had offered a word of apology or regret. Nor have we heard a word from the co-opted regulators; nor from Alan Greenspan or Ben Bernanke; nor from the legion of renowned economists who got it all wrong (and most of whom continue to do so). They do take offense at what they declare to have been their unfair treatment.
“For the bankers, of course, there exists no sense of obligation to the citizenry or the public at large. The only stake-holders who count are their tame boards of directors and the stockholders. The former have been coopted or neutered. The latter are bought off by hefty profits from activities licit or illicit.
University “The virus of arbitrary leadership has spread as far as America’s great universities. (Reference HP) To anyone with direct experience of how matters of consequence are handled in today’s citadels of academe, the shift away from some approximation of a consultative approach on major policy issues is striking. The phenomenon may not be universal, but it is widespread and growing. So, too, is the haughty attitude of senior administrators that the institution’s well-being is their affair as proprietors who have the right to choose whether to deign to seek the advice or counsel (almost never approval) of those in whose name they administer. Faculty increasingly are viewed as staff, staff as hirelings and students as customers/product.
“This attitude affects the mechanisms and methods of policy-setting as well as the policies’ substance. It is now routine for plans to be set, and projects for implementation to be designed by senior administrators (advised by grasping consultants with dubious credentials) with only the most cursory solicitation of input from other constituents – or none at all. That input, such as it is, increasingly is pro forma and/or after the main fact. The rare cases of vehement protests by faculty or alumni elicit at best a high-minded call from the President for a ‘conversation’ that inevitability evaporates into nothingness.
“These trends are visible at public as well as private institutions despite the fact that the former in principle are open to scrutiny by citizens, tax-payers and all those in the community with an interest in higher education. Indeed, it is public universities that we found the most stunning examples of governance by cabal – usually led by an autocratic majority of the Board of Regents in connivance with elected state officials as happened at the University of Virginia. University presidents have been known to collaborate with them – in some instances.
“What aspects of university life are the targets of arbitrary action? Just about everything: tuition, faculty/student ratios, a shift to temporary/part-time faculty, responsiveness to allegations of rape and other offenses that could endanger the school’s reputation and thereby revenues, the ‘privatization’ of staff functions to cut expenditures to the bone, what levels of political activity on campus will be tolerated, etc. It is a rare institution where a serious effort is made to involve faculty in the process of deliberation and decision. Staff almost never. (Some adjunct professors have had their contracted teaching hours cut so as to disqualify them for institutional health insurance mandated by Obamacare).
“The tendency is to view both as encumbrances to projects that will ‘improve’ the university – by the lights of those at the top – rather than engage or serve either useful contributors or deserving stakeholders. They are ‘speed bumps’ to be circumvented if possible. This is the essence of institutional ‘possession.’
“To repeat, this description of developments in the university world is not an assertion that these practices characterize all institutions. They do point to clear, unmistakable trends in higher education from the most prestigious elite schools to the community colleges.
“It is the stress on the self-decreed prerogatives of university heads that stands out – more so than the dubious policies themselves. They relish the distance that separates them from those ‘drones’ from whose ranks they have ascended. Assertion of superiority is symbolized by the perks of office which leaders grant themselves. Salaries, above all. There are now 42 university presidents whose annual income exceeds $1 million. 4 more who lead public state universities.
“That number has risen sharply over the past five years – as has the size of those salary increases (a 36% rise between 2008 and 2012). Topping the list is the University of Chicago’s Robert Zimmer who earns $3,358,723. To put that number in perspective, it is 40 X what a starting assistant professor earns, and it is nearly 80 X what most staff earn. (Chronicle of Higher Education December 15, 2013). The sad truth is that many university presidents are more comfortable in the company of business tycoons and high powered politics than that of their professorial cohort.
“In an era of pervasive austerity, declared penury, and downsizing – university leaders have enjoyed an unprecedented spike in their earnings. The phenomenon is apiece with the Janus faced attitude of the financial lords who preach austerity to the rest of the country while raking in a Midas like bounty. At least in the banking world, everyone on the inside gets a slice of the pie. Not so in the universities.
Trappings of Status “Money has become not just the measure of worth and status. It is used to separate the few rulers from the mass of ruled. (Presidents and other elected officials must await the end of their terms in office to reap the full tangible benefits of the good life – a la the Clintons). Money and other comforts are companion to the autocratic style of leadership. Incommensurate riches are permitted by a culture that has replaced republican simplicity with tinsel grandeur as the dominant motif. Those incommensurate riches, in turn, give institutional heads the wherewithal to reinforce their dominant-subordinate relationship with those they rule – both by material means and by conveying the impression of superior status.
“In the governmental arena, the trappings of power convey the same message and serve the same purpose. Presidents and their appointed lords of the realm no longer see themselves as citizens first, last and always. So too is that evident in the attitudes and comportment of senior commanders of our armed forces, the Director of the National Security Agency, and the President of the Federal Reserve – all of whom treat the public more as subjects than citizens. A decent respect for the opinions of fellow citizens and their right to an honest accounting of the public business is normally invisible.
“Ben Bernanke, the last mentioned, never has come clean about the Fed’s key role in facilitating the practices that produced the crash of 2008; or the opaque ‘facilities’ that salvaged the zombie banks which were hidden from Congress even as he and Treasury Secretary John Paulson pressured it to provide TARP funds by arguing that they was crucial to keeping the entire system from unraveling; or how trillions of toxic assets were absorbed by crediting the banks with their face value; or the behind the scenes campaign to block the re-imposition of meaningful financial regulation. All this while the main perpetrators, and beneficiaries of this historic scam and abdication of public responsibility, sat on the Fed’s Board of Governors. Leveling with the American people is an idea that seems never to have crossed his mind.
“Too many leaders think and act as a separate caste who covet status and privileges that match those of crowned heads and their mandarins. Amidst the pomp that surrounds the modern presidency, it is easy to forget that this exaltation of the man in the White House is something relatively new. A visit to Roosevelt’s Hyde Park Library or Truman’s Independence, Missouri is instructive on this score. So is the manifest pleasure that its occupants derive from it. The ceremony, the huge entourages that accompany the President wherever he goes, the endless swirl of gossip about his doings are more akin to the courts of the Great Mogul, the Czar of All the Russias, or the Chinese Emperor than they are faithful to the spirit of the Republic – or the conduct of those who governed it for the first 175 years of its existence.” END OF BRENNER’S ARTICLE; Read more.
“It is not needed nor fitting here that a general argument should be made in favor of popular institutions, but there is one point… to which I ask a brief attention. It is the effort to place capital on an equal footing with, if not above, labor in the structure of government….it is next considered whether it is best that capital shall hire laborers, and thus induce them to work by their own consent, or buy them and drive them to it without their consent. Having proceeded so far, it is naturally concluded that all laborers are either hired laborers or what we call slaves….Let them beware of surrendering a political power which they already possess, and which if surrendered will surely be used to close the door of advancement against such as they and to fix new disabilities and burdens upon them till all of liberty shall be lost.” Abraham Lincoln, December 3, 1861, here.
Who is Edward Mandell House?
“…every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency…..
“Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.
“They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call ‘Social Insurance.’
‘Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America….” Read more. Also read, Is Diane Reidy the Last Sane Person on Capitol Hill? here.
Woodrow Wilson “convinced the anti-bank Congressmen that because Federal Reserve notes were obligations of the government, the plan fit their demands. Wilson assured southerners and westerners that the system was decentralized into 12 districts, and thus would weaken New York City’s Wall Street influence and strengthen the hinterlands. After much debate and many amendments Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act or Glass-Owen Act, as it was sometimes called at the time, in late 1913. President Wilson signed the Act into law on December 23, 1913.” Read more.
TRUSTEE: “An individual or corporation named by an individual, who sets aside property to be used for the benefit of another person, to manage the property as provided by the terms of the document that created the arrangement.”
“A trustee manages property that is held in trust. A trust is an arrangement in which one person holds the property of another for the benefit of a third party, called the beneficiary. The beneficiary is usually the owner of the property or a person designated as the beneficiary by the owner of the property. A trustee may be either an individual or a corporation. Trusts are useful for investment purposes, and they offer various tax advantages. Another purpose of trusts is to keep the trust property, usually money, out of the hands of the owner. This may be desirable if the beneficiary of the trust is incompetent, immature, or a spendthrift.Trustees have certain obligations to the beneficiary of the trust. State statutes may address the duties of a trustee, but much of the law covering such obligations is often found in a state’s case law, or court opinions.
“A trustee is a fiduciary of the trust beneficiary. A fiduciary is legally bound to act, within the confines of the law, in the best interests of the beneficiary. A trustee is in a special position of confidence in relation to the beneficiary because the trustee has control of property that is essentially owned by the beneficiary.
“Most trustees possess special knowledge about trusts and investments. By contrast, many beneficiaries are ignorant of such matters. This special knowledge is another feature of the trustee-beneficiary relationship that makes a trustee a fiduciary. A trustee must submit honest reports to the beneficiary and keep the beneficiary informed of all matters relevant to the trust…..” Read more.
“The insiders’ sheepdog who controlled Wilson and guided the program through Congress was the mysterious “Colonel’ Edward Mandel House, the British-educated son of a representative of England’s financial interests in the American South.
“The title was honorary; House never served in the military. He was strictly a behind-the-scenes wirepuller and is regarded by many historians as the real President of the United States during the Wilson years. House authored a book, “Philip Dru: Administrator”, in which he wrote of establishing “Socialism as dreamed by Karl Marx” As steps toward his goal, House, both in his book and in real life, called for passage of a graduated income tax and a central bank providing “a flexible [inflatable paper] currency.”
“The graduated income tax and a central bank are two of the ten planks of The Communist Manifesto. In his The intimate Papers 0f Colonel House, Professor Charles Seymour [here] refers to the “Colonel” as the “unseen guardian angel” of the Federal Reserve Act.
“Seymour’s work contains numerous documents and records showing constant contact between House and Paul Warburg while the Federal Reserve Act was being prepared and steered through Congress. Biographer George Viereck assures us that “The Schiffs, the Warburgs, the Kahns, the Rockefellers, and the Morgans put their faith in House… Their faith was amply rewarded.” None Dare Call it Conspiracy by Gary Allen, here.
How To Steal an Estate
Organized Crime has a Procedures Manual for destroying families and stealing their estates. It’s NOT pretty. Knowing how these crimes work will help you to protect yourself and your loved ones. Many people report very similar experiences. Here it is…
STEP ONE: Assess Opportunities & Establish Yourself
Identify Elderly Affluent People Who Are Alone – Target people who live alone and whose children or heirs live and work out of state.
Elderly Childless People Are Good – Children and grandchildren are hard but not impossible to displace. Childless people may not have obvious heirs making it much easier for you to establish your position.
Assess Their Estate Decisions – How large is their estate? Do they have a will? How strongly do they feel about the disposition of their assets? The greater their uncertainty, the better it is for you.
Avoid Worthwhile Causes – People who want to leave their estates to worthwhile causes must see you as being more deserving than their cause. Charities are skilled at maintaining close ties with their donors.
Aversion to Extended Care – The best targets have a horror of nursing homes and extended care facilities and have a strong desire to continue living in their home until they die. Convince them their heirs will put them away and that you will help them stay independent until the end.
Length of Life Span – Unless your target is terminally ill or very elderly, expect this to be a long term project. Once you are sole beneficiary you will still need to defend your position until they expire. You obviously want the money as soon as possible. Ways to hasten their death are not posted on this site.
Become a Close Neighbor – This is by far the best and easiest way to ensure access and influence. It allows you to monitor all their activities and all their other relationships.
Create Reasons to See Them Often, Daily is Best – Find legitimate reasons to see them often to gain their trust, build influence and eventual control of them.
Alcohol Helps – Alcohol lowers people’s resistance, raises their susceptibility to suggestion, makes them relax, feel good and festive. It’s easy to manipulate alcoholics and make them angry and emotional.
People Are Especially Susceptible To Suggestion When Sleepy – During those hazy, lazy moments when they are just drifting off to sleep or waking up. Visit or telephone when the impact of your communication will linger in their minds long after you finish.
Always be Smiling, Positive and Loving – They must see you as special, especially deserving and associate you with only the most positive, wonderful feelings.
Be Sincere and Genuine – Elderly people are much smarter than they seem and know when they are being worked. Develop a sincere interest in their welfare, it makes you more convincing. As they age they will eventually depend and rely on you to support them.
Approve of Everything They Do – Unconditional Love And Approval Are Absolute Requirements! Separate and differentiate yourself from their heirs and people who disapprove or disagree with them or try to tell them what to do.
Always Take Their Side And Fault Anyone Who Disagrees With Them – This is the GOLDEN RULE! You want them to eventually sever or discount all other relationships so they rely, trust and love only you.
Leave Them On A High Note, Feeling Very Good About You – Treat each interaction as a professional. Each performance must further your goal of showing them you are their ONLY deserving heir.
Talk To Them Like Family – Tell them they are the wonderful father / mother or aunt / uncle you always wish you had. Plant family associations and connections in their mind.
Disappear When Their Family or Children Appear – This is VERY important! If the rightful heirs see what you are doing before you have gained full control, they will stop your relationship. Tell your target you want to respect the time they have with their family and children, this will make you seem especially loving and considerate.
Love What They Love – Whatever they cherish, love it too. Be seen as much nicer than anyone else who might dislike or disapprove of what they love or do.
Get Into A Position Of Trust And Authority – Manage their checkbook, their investments, their grocery money. Whatever you do, be VERY Honest. Your purpose is to show how honorable and trustworthy you are. Don’t steal early, wait for the big prize.
Cash Gifts – Make sure they know how much you really love them and not their money. Get gifts in cash which cannot be easily traced.
Act Like The Perfect Son Or Daughter – Be the perfect child they always wish they had. Appear far more deserving than any of their family members.
Create A Fun Secret Conspiracy, Build Secrecy Early – Tell them their daughter/son/rightful heir might get a little upset and jealous, so let’s just keep it our little secret! Let’s have fun and not tell them! They don’t have a right to know about everything you do any how!
Always Operate in Secret – Do NOT leave any proof or evidence of what you are doing or what you have done.
Keep the Rightful Heirs Ignorant of Your Relationship – If they sense you are becoming too close to their loved one before you have gained complete control, they will worry about your relationship and end it.
STEP TWO: Discredit and Displace The Heirs
It’s A Military Campaign – You are investing time and energy to gain control of their estate. If victorious, you will never have to work again. It is a long term project that requires guts, drive, determination, hard work and dirty deeds. Enjoy Doing Evil and Being Ruthless and Cruel. Your Goal: To Completely Discredit and Disinherit Existing Heirs
Hate The Heirs – You must absolutely hate and despise the heirs you are disinheriting. You need to transfer a vicious, angry hatred to your target so that neither of you feels badly about what you are doing. Show no mercy. Hate is an absolute prerequisite for success.
Spy, Stalk & Hack Them – Use inexpensive technologies that allow you to do this easily. Yes, it’s illegal, but so is defrauding elderly people and destroying their family relationships.
Truth and Righteousness – Show them the real truth about their heirs, illustrate and explain how their heirs have abused and misused them all their lives.
Collaborate If You Can – Is there an unhappy family member who can help you disinherit the others? Collaborate with them. Make sure you always have more on your collaborator than they have on you.
Turn All Innocent, Well-Intentioned Acts into Damning Condemnations of the Heir’s Misbehavior – Everything they do is wrong. Make sure everyone adopts the same thinking. The heirs have NEVER done anything right.
Restate Reality Into Wrongs – Change innocuous comments into outrageous, inflammatory lies that are loudly and emphatically proclaimed by your collaborators. Lies become verified truth and reality.
SEVER ALL COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE HEIRS – This is VERY IMPORTANT! If your target refuses to communicate with their heirs, the heirs can’t exert influence, change their minds or fight your plans.
Use Anger & Betrayal – Get your target very angry with their heirs and keep them angry so they will cease all communications with the heirs. Make them feel angry, betrayed, devalued, used and abused. Use every tool at your disposal, create conflict every way you can.
Creating Conflict – If reasons to be angry with the heirs don’t exist, create them. The heirs are in the dark, they don’t know what you are doing. Tell damaging lies, falsify letters and “proof” of the heirs horrible dishonesty and misdeeds.
Continue Your Campaign of Conflict with the Heirs – Be relentless. Start small and gradually build over time. Do everything you can to destroy their relationships and any positive memories of their heirs.
Avoid Isolation – Encourage your target to continue their normal activities except those involving the heirs. You want them to appear normal to friends and associates who can validate their feelings. Isolating elderly people can be used to prove undue influence.
Involve An Attorney – The attorney who prepares the will be questioned if the will is challenged. Make sure their attorney supports you and will help you prove that they truly want you to enjoy their entire estate.
Rewrite Reality Repeatedly Over Time – A lie repeated over and over again over time eventually becomes truth. This is one of your most powerful tools. Repeatedly demonstrating what bad people their heirs are will eventually make your target believe it.
Discredit and Disparage – It is very hard to get people to go against long held, deep set beliefs and values. It’s much easier to change their memories and perceptions of reality.
Repeatedly Ridicule and Revile The Heirs – Laugh, make ridicule fun and entertaining. Bond with mutual hatred of the heirs, their greed and all their misdeeds.
Develop a Fun, Secret Conspiracy – Involve your target in fun little dirty tricks that hurt and harm the heirs. Encourage them to enjoy playing tricks to punish their heirs for all their abuse and mistreatment.
Discredit and Destroy the Heirs – Hurt and weaken them any way you can. Can you harm their business? Their career? Spread damaging lies about them? Do it, your financial future is at stake. Destroy them if you can so they can’t fight you.
Involve Organized Crime, Stalking and Hate Groups – Pay criminals to create havoc in the heir’s life, but only do it through intermediaries so it cannot be traced to you. Major life disruptions can be caused by surprisingly minor dirty tricks disguised as life’s bad breaks. Sick, psychotic people enjoy hurting people, getting paid for it is a plus.
STEP THREE: Savor Your Triumph
Enjoy Being Evil – Think about all the fun you will have and all the wonderful things you will do with the target’s money and how much you enjoy hurting the stupid, unsuspecting heirs.
You are so much better, smarter and deserving than they are.
You deserve the money.
The human mind has no firewall. Elderly People Are Weak And Vulnerable. Heirs are helpless, they don’t know what you are doing until it is too late….Read more.
“A young woman doctor discovers something sinister going on in her hospital. Relatively healthy patients are having ‘complications’ during simple operations and ending up in comas. The patients are then shipped off to an institute that looks after them. The young doctor suspects there is more to this than meets the eye.” Read more. Watch this trailer for the film, Coma.