If you don’t agree with this practice, which is de facto slavery for the American people, then why not “salvage” our own property ourselves? Why not manage our own “currency?” Aren’t WE the owners of this country? It’s decentralizing and will break up the monopoly. Check out this article, inspired by Robb Ryder’s video, Accept the Deed and be the Owner, Part 1 and Part 2.
FORBES Throughout history, there have been “peasant uprisings” in response to ill-treatment by rulers. These “peasant uprisings” have many details but one basic message: “Please, Sir, don’t beat me so hard.”
From the perspective of the rulers, a few peasant uprisings are a sign of good management. If there were no such uprisings, it means that you should exploit the peasants a little more aggressively.
“Peasant uprisings” don’t accomplish much. “Occupy Wall Street” was one such peasant uprising. Sheep also go “baaaa” when they are shorn.
What does work is a new vision. You need an alternative to the present power structure. Whether a Communist Revolution in some places, or an Independence Movement and Democratic Revolution in the United States in 1776 (and France in 1789), a very clear alternative to present rule is proposed. This vision animates the imagination of the people, and drives them to fight until the old order is deposed and the new order (for better or worse) is introduced.
This is revolution. It begins in the imagination.
If you want to End the Fed, you need to create a vision of what would replace it. It needs to be a sound vision, not one with obvious problems, because nobody is going to risk it all to overturn the existing order for something that is clearly a pile of horse poop.
Historically, the choice between Mercantilist and Classical monetary approaches, floating currencies vs. a gold standard, has also been a choice between monopoly currency control and distributed or “free market” currency control. There are exceptions — the Bank of England was both a monopoly currency issuer and the gold standard’s greatest example — but that pattern has recurred over time.
In the United States, we have had a Federal Reserve currency monopoly essentially since about 1940.
What if the U.S. Treasury managed the currency? Then, it could be managed “for the greater good,” rather than the enrichment (as some argue) of too-big-to-fail banks and certain European banking families.
Alas, U.S. Treasury monopoly of currency has been just as problematic, in U.S. history, as Federal Reserve monopoly.
The last major experiment in Treasury control of currency was the Continental Dollar of 1776-1785. It was such a disaster that the Founding Fathers decided to move to a distributed, free-banking model for the new United States.
Since then, whenever the Treasury has had financial difficulties, it has printed money, just as it did during the Revolutionary War. In the War of 1812, it printed Treasury Notes. In the Civil War, it printed United States Notes. In World War I and World War II, it strongarmed the Fed to print Federal Reserve Notes. Today? Nothing new, I’m afraid.
The only reason these did not become Continental Dollar-type disasters is that the wars were over relatively quickly. They got lucky.
Unfortunately, someone has to manage the currency. Except for the case of bullion coins that trade on metal weight, currencies don’t manage themselves. That system is now impossible due to the demonetization of silver in the 1870s. We would have no effective small-denomination money.
In any case, that system is rudimentary in the extreme. The United States outgrew it as early as 1810 or so, as dozens and then hundreds of commercial banks began issuing gold-linked paper banknotes as an alternative to metal coins.
This tends to leave us with some form of “free banking system,” perhaps somewhat like what existed in the United States from 1789 to 1913.
In general, I suggest that there be “enough” independent banknote issuers, but “not too many.” The U.S. currency system became bewildering by 1860, when nearly two thousand banks issued their own banknotes. (All of these banknotes were nevertheless linked to gold at the official dollar parity of 23.20 troy grains of gold, or $20.67 per troy ounce.) Who could tell what was a legitimate note and what was a counterfeit? Who knew what the financial condition of these banks were?
Banknotes traded “at a discount” based on perceived reliability. In other words, each “dollar bill” had a different market value. What a mess!
If it was a mess on a domestic basis, imagine foreign exchange and international trade.
Thus emerged the National Bank Act of 1863. The Act standardized the value of all banknotes by requiring all member banks to accept other member banks’ banknotes at face value. Member banks’ financial conditions were monitored, and capital adequacy ratios imposed. A record of all currency-issuing banks was maintained and published.
The National Bank Act had some problems too, but government oversight (via the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which still exists) helped resolve many problems that had emerged in the more “laissez-faire” era of free banking in the United States prior to 1860.
Today, I suggest that a distributed multi-issuer model should have “enough” banknote-issuing entities (doesn’t have to be a “bank”) to avoid any tendency toward monopoly, but “not too many,” such that the system becomes dizzyingly complex while offering no significant additional advantage. I suggest this number might be between ten and one hundred banknote-issuing entities, probably under an umbrella of oversight much like the National Bank system.
The multiple banknote-issuer model is already in use today, in places like Hong Kong.
We will talk a lot more about how to “End the Fed” in the future.
You don’t like my “what comes after the Fed” proposal? Fine. Make a new one. Lots of different things can work. In the late 19th century — the “most perfect monetary system the world has ever seen” — each country had a somewhat different approach. Sometimes, very different. It will be that way again in the future.
But, it can’t be a stupid proposal. Unfortunately, gold standard advocates have a history of … well, I am running out of euphemisms, so let’s just say that we still need an updated “shelf of books” that describe, in detail, what this new system could look like. I think Ron Paul’s recent book End the Fed begins that conversation in an excellent way. Richard Timberlake’s wonderful Monetary Policy in the United States, an Intellectual and Institutional History, documents the U.S.’s experience with distributed banknote-issuer systems prior to the Federal Reserve’s introduction in 1913.
Let’s keep going with this discussion. END OF ARTICLE BY NATHAN LEWIS
Ed. Note: Read recent news. How to get a Non-Citizen National USA (not U.S.) passport, PDF. What is the secret? Soylent Green is People! Check out this information below re: the Berth Certificate. Then, accept the Deed and be the Owner, here. Check out Beacon of Truth. Read Public Law 88-243-December 30, 1963, PDF.
“‘Let them eat cake’ is the traditional translation of the French phrase “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche“, supposedly spoken by “a great princess” upon learning that the peasants had no bread. Since brioche was made from dough enriched with butter and eggs, and those ingredients were even more scarce and more costly than dough, making brioche even more out of the reach of the peasants than bread, the quote supposedly would reflect the princess’s obliviousness as to the condition of the people.” Read more.
“I am that bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die. I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” John 6:48-51
Macquirelatory The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated in conjunction with efforts to harmonize the law of sales and other commercial transactions in all 50 states within the United States of America.
The Uniform Commercial Code is looked upon as the bible in the world of business. Under Caeser of Rome, it was established that all nations in the empire that do any form of business, should all play on a level field, but what is not told is that the UCC is based directly on Vatican Canon Law, of the Roman Canon Law, which means, its regulations are under the Roman Catholic Church. Now, you maybe wondering what this has to do with birth certificates, so let’s break down the origin of birth certificates.
Question: What is a berth? To come into or dock at a wharf such as when a ship comes into a dock, it arrives. So consequently, when a ship pulls into a port, it pulls in and stops, that is called its berth, because the ship has now arrived. So because it is on the laws of the high seas, it is governed by the UCC Commercial Law. So when the ship pulls in to it’s berth, the first thing the captain must do is to present a certificate of manifest to the port authorities.
What is a certificate of manifest? It is a document listing a ship’s contents, cargo, crew, and passengers. So whatever the ship brings in at berth, the captain has to present a certificate of manifest showing the identity and value of the items on the ship. Now consequently, when people are born, they come out of their mother’s water, therefore they must have a birth certificate, which is a certificate of manifest, because the people are considered a corporation owned item, they are a human resource. This goes back to the German Nazi concept, that every human coming out of their mother’s water must be birthed, and therefore the people have to have a certificate of manifest, to see who this individual is and how much they are going to make for the government in their New World Order.
So, since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence. All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated “warehouse receipts” for births and marriages in order to pledge the people as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve’s banks. The “Full faith and credit” of the American people is said to be that which back the nation’s debt. That simply means the American people’s ability to labor and pay back that debt. In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end. Humans today are looked upon merely as resources – “human resources,” that is. Why do you think when you call to see if a company is hiring, you have to go through a division known as Human Resource?
The people are resources to the government, their birth certificates are a security on the New York Stock Exchange, which is why if you look at all birth certificate’s in America, it will say at the bottom this is printed on security paper, do not accept if not on full color security paper. At the bottom, you will always have a series of numbers, red numbers printed on the birth certificate, in which those numbers are a security stock exchange number on the World Stock Exchange, in which the American people are worth money to the International Bank that bought the government in the 1930’s.
Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens in America began on July 14, 1862, when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a “per head” basis. See the government knows that they can only extract so much money out of the economy, so their idea is to bankrupt private owners so that the banks who are behind this syndicate become the owners of all the assets in this country. That’s the real scheme; that’s the real motive.
By encouraging Congress to spend money it doesn’t have, Congress has to turn around and “lien” on American labor and American private property for collateral. See, they do that by fraudulent conversion of birth certificates, for example. Doctors, who are franchisees of the state, are obliged to sign birth certificates and forward them on to the Secretary of State…. They make certified copies and forward those birth certificates to the Department of Commerce in Washington, D.C. The Department of Commerce does the same thing: they make certified copies and forward them on to the International Monetary Fund in Brussels, Belgium.
Now this is the center of the hub of the banking syndicate and they are, of course, loaning these huge sums to various governments around the world, including the Congress of the United States. The Congress needs something for collateral, and what they use for collateral are these birth certificates. They get treated as certificates in equity which mature on the 18th birthday of the person whose name appears on the birth certificate. The bank then keeps track of these and uses the number that any particular nation has available, as collateral on the international debt, as “performance units” on the international debt. These certificates in equity end up being regarded as “performance units” on the international debt.
The more of those you have, the more money you can borrow. It’s like this: the more collateral I have, the more money I can borrow from banks and the more I can secure. So, governments are securing their international debt by “liening” on the persons and property of their citizens. They’re doing this on a massive scale, and it’s technically a fraudulent conversion of the birth certificate because, if they did that with your birth certificate, they never told you they were doing it. They never told you they were obtaining a lien on your person and starting a third-party debt that you’re responsible for. You had no meaningful choice in the matter, which makes it an “unconscionable contract” by definition.
Think of it very simply, as walking into a department store and saying to the salesman, “I really like that refrigerator over there, I want to buy it, ship it to my home tomorrow, and send the bill to, say, Willy Brown.” So the next day, the refrigerator ends up in your garage, and the bill ends up in Willy Brown’s mail. Willy Brown opens his mail and says, “What’s this, Sears? One refrigerator, $800? What is this? I didn’t buy this. I’m not a party to this transaction. I didn’t even know about it. Why are they billing me? There must be a mistake here.”
Ed. Note: Something similar to this example happens to Jerry Shaw, the character played by Shia LaBeouf, in the film, Eagle Eye (2008). “Shia LaBeouf and Michelle Monaghan star in Disturbia director D.J. Caruso’s race-against-time thriller concerning two strangers thrust together by a mysterious telephone call, and their frantic efforts to discover why they have inexplicably become the nation’s most wanted fugitives.” Read more.
Well, this is kind of like what is happening now. In this example, the department store is the Federal Reserve. They’re supplying Federal Reserve Notes, right? Willy Brown is the American people, and I — the one who went in there and bought the refrigerator in the first place — I represent Congress. And I’m saying, “Don’t send the bill to me, send it to the American people. And you can lien on their property, by the way. You can use our police, we’ll enforce it for you; we’ll extract the money.” So that’s the fraud the government and Obama is keeping from the American people.
The fraud is that Congress bankrupted the U.S. Treasury and turned all their gold over to the Federal Reserve banks, which are not federal government agencies.
The Federal Reserve is a “municipal corporation” created by an act of Congress, but it’s still a corporation. And all that gold is now in their hands. But there wasn’t enough to discharge the debt that had accumulated up to 1933. They had to go into bankruptcy to discharge the rest of the debt. They’re using standard federal bankruptcy rules for this, but the creditors, of course, are in charge. And they’re back there telling Congress, “Go ahead, continue spending more money that you don’t have, because we know we’ll take it out of the land and the labor of the American people, ultimately.”
And that’s what’s going on. Look at the current economic situation, the government is using Obama to push this idea concept of stimulus checks as a way for slowing down inflation, creating jobs, and giving the American people more money to spend. Now to the average puppet, this doesn’t seem like a bad idea, but what the government doesn’t tell the people is that, in the process of them giving these stimulus checks for the American people to spend more money, it will only devalue the American Dollar, and the banks will close up, because how can you spend more in a recession to boost the economy? Therefore by the banks closing up, it will force the American people into a one way electronic spending money system, that will be monitored and administered by the government, forcing the people into compliance with their New World Order.
In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth “registration” or what we now know as the “birth certificate.” It was known as the “Maternity Act” and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for “other purposes.” One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures.
What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating “federal children.” This government, under the doctrine of “Parens Patriae,” now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for “permission” from the government imposing as God, to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a “free country.”
Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as “official” records.
Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child’s birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the United States , thereby making him/her a United States Citizen.
For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth. In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the “full faith and credit” of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system. To wit:”Full faith and credit” clause of Const. U.S. article 4. sec. 1, requires that foreign judgement be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgement or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken.
The state claims an interest in every child within it’s jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. Why do you think they teach teachers to not only teach their students, but their parents that their child needs a good education so that they can grow up and get a good job? Lol they been making the people slaves for years and no one has ever stopped to question them on it? The child itself, when born, is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked, thus making whomever gets a birth certificate owned by the state. Everyone who has a birth certificate, are considered assets of the bankrupt United States of America, which makes them designated by this government as “HUMAN RESOURCES”. Again, ask yourself, why do you think when you call to see if a company is hiring, you have to go through a division known as Human Resource? Better wakeup folks!
Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by the government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist. They have no legislation for ordering you to have a identification card, health card, and so forth, but they know the people are ignorant to the Law, so therefore by ignorance of the people, the government is allowed to freely at will keep coming up with forms of taxation against the American people. Birth Certificates proves that you are national property of the International Banks.
The birth certificate thus becomes a form of theft, the theft of the child’s true identity as a free child of God to a servant of the State. By affixing a national seal of approval to a child, the state denies the freedom, rights, and dignity that God has ordained in the scriptures. You don’t need proof that you were born, you breathing is proof enough for these hypocrites. By requiring a license, the state is claiming complete control and ownership over your liberty, and property.
Christ’s assembly does not exist on paper, but in the hearts of men, and is expressed in their outward acts. Because there is no breath of Life from God in such pieces of paper, we should not look to them for any authority for doing anything. Christ is our authority for doing the things we do.
Now ask yourself, have you ever, in your entire life, “signed” your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS? Of course not! Haven’t you always used both upper and lower case letters to sign your name? Yes. And why is that? Because that is what you have been taught since a child. Because the standard Rule of Law governing the use of English Grammar states that the correct Capitalization of Proper Names must begin with a capital letter, and the rest of the name must be spelled in smaller case letters.
At Law, this lets others know you are an entity created by God, and not an entity created by man. Now, there are entities created by man, Corporations for example. Corporations are known as “persons” created by the government. They are created on a piece of paper and brought into existence by the government. To differentiate between those created by God and those created by the government, those created by the government have their names spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. This lets others know that this entity does not have a body, soul, and spirit like man has, but that this is a fictitious entity created for the purpose of making a profit.
Now, if you look at a license, or ID Card or Birth Certificate, you will notice the name that appears on it is spelled in all capital letters! What this means, at law, is that the entity that is named on this license is a creature of the government, and not a creature of God. It means that entity is a servant of Caesar, and not a servant of God…read more.