What Does Accepted for Value Mean from the American Connection

Certified Record of Birth-McCauleyDavidSr-2-
Certified Record of Birth-McCauleyDavidSr-2-

Ed. Note: The birth-related graphics, embedded below, are from this article PDF. Listen to this recording from David Clarence and the rest of David’s recordings listed at the bottom of this article. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act here. Check out this PDF. Watch all of the videos at this Robb Ryder playlist. Check out Robb’s site. American Society of Notaries here. Listen to this playlist. Listen to this Tami Pepperman playlist. What is an “eligible obligation?”

The American Connection Accepted for Value (A4V) is at the foundation of remedies available for commercial demands made by the United States, so many people have attempted to use it to close accounts in the United States. Even so, no one has had a good explanation of what A4V means. Here is an attempt to clarify.

Premises of Identity – Jurisdiction

Challenging Jurisdiction

Document Evidencing the registration of birth with the Dept. of Commerce.
Document Evidencing the registration of birth with the Dept. of Commerce.

The Uniform Commercial Code in Article 3 that deals with negotiable instruments is one source of explanation. Article 8 deals with investment securities, and Article 9 deals with secured transactions. In addition to opinions written by judges to shed light on our remedies, all three of these articles hold a key to understanding commercial setoff.

The UCC had an overhaul in 2000, but the major principles remain the same. The changes appear to be to the sections that deal with secured transactions (Article 9) and some with investment securities (Article 8), but negotiable instruments are what lead to those securities. The phrase “accepted for value” has little coverage in the code books or in court opinions. A better understanding of the commercial terms “acceptance” and “value” and how they relate to instruments in general would be a good place to start.

Acceptance 1. An agreement, either by express act or by implication from conduct, to the terms of an offer so that a binding contract is formed. * If an acceptance modifies the terms or adds new ones, it generally operates as a counteroffer. Black’s 7th

Accept. To receive with approval or satisfaction; to receive with intent to Acceptance. The taking and receiving of anything in good part, and as it were a tacit agreement to a preceding act, which might have been defeated or avoided if such acceptance had not been made. Black’s 4th

A naked acceptance waives remedies that are available by waiving defects in the instrument (agreement) that is being offered and accepted. Receiving an instrument is an acceptance and a taking. Retention is the basis for a binding contract if there is a preceding act like a pledge to the United States. Altering the terms of the instrument and returning it operates as a counteroffer.

The File Number, 34948, on this Certified Record of Birth matches the Notification of Birth issued by the Dept. of Commerce.
The File Number, 34948, on this Certified Record of Birth matches the Notification of Birth issued by the Dept. of Commerce.

UCC 1-201(44) General definitions

(44) Value“. Except as otherwise provided with respect to negotiable instruments and bank collections (Sections 3-303, 4-208 and 4-209) a person gives “value” for rights if he acquires them

  • (a) in return for a binding commitment to extend credit or for the extension of immediately available credit whether or not drawn upon and whether or not a charge-back is provided for in the event of difficulties in collection; or
  • (b) as security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a pre-existing claim; or
  • (c) by accepting delivery pursuant to a pre-existing contract for purchase; or
  • (d) generally, in return for any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract.

UCC 1-201(44) generally says that a person gives value. He gives value to get rights. If one person is giving value, another person is asked to give rights in exchange. Both giving value and giving rights meet the element of consideration

The question has to be – What constitutes value? In today’s commercial system where ownership is not the prime focus, interest (rights) in things takes the place of ownership as the goal. A security interest constitutes a right to seize control of a pledged thing if the one giving the security interest fails to perform as agreed.

The one giving a security interest retains possession of the thing that secures the right of another party to seize possession of the thing that backs the security interest that was given. The one receiving a security interest becomes a secured party, especially if the instrument establishing the security interest is registered. He has rights, which are remedies and defenses that he can use to enforce an agreement if the other party fails to perform as agreed.

UCC 1-201 (36) General definitions

“Rights” includes remedies.

A remedy is a commercial right for those who acquire that right through an instrument. In corporate United States, there must be a written record of everything.  Nothing is supposed to be assumed or presumed, but that does not mean assumptions and presumptions are not used everyday to acquire rights and enforce them. If the right that is being enforced is a security interest in a tangible or intangible thing, it usually comes from an instrument that is actually supported by the thing. This is usually, but not always, a pledge or a promise to relinquish possession of a thing if there is a breach of an agreement.

Because enforcement of a contract based on an implied promise is weak, an instrument demanding performance on it is an offer to initiate a new contract based on an old (antecedent) and maybe implied or unenforceable contact. If an instrument is based on an intentional written promise to perform and an intentional pledge to relinquish property, it does not have to be issued for value. It is just issued, and the original contract with the offeror’s right to the pledged property is the consideration that supports the demand.

A copy of the written promise and pledge can be attached to the instrument, or the instrument can just refer to the contract by its title, number, or date, etc. The issuer of the instrument demanding performance supported by a written promise has defenses if the debtor files a complaint against the issuer for making the demand.

The issuer can produce the antecedent contract that contains the intentional promise to perform and the intentional pledge to use tangible or intangible property to secure that performance. If the debtor is aware that he had previously signed a promise and pledged his right to a thing to guarantee his performance, he would not have to see the contract. The demand instrument is issued to get performance already promised, or in the alternative to get the thing already pledged.

Dept of Commerce Lighthouse Seal
Dept of Commerce Lighthouse Seal

In some cases, there is no pledge to support an instrument, so it must be issued and transferred for value (with implied consideration). There is no debtor. The issuer does not have a written instrument to back his demand instrument. If he decides to issue the demand instrument in spite of his lack of authority, he is risking liability on the instrument. If the transferee (the one who the issuer directs the demand to) calls the issuer’s bluff, the issuer could be made to pay the transferee. The issuer (transferor) has no defenses. He has no antecedent contract to attach as consideration for the demand he is sending to the transferee. If the issuer has no written pledge but still decides to issue a demand, the demand instrument must be issued for value, because there is no evidence of pledge to attach to it. There is no written antecedent contract obligation that requires the transferee to perform, but he still has to do something with the demand.

Public Private Distinction in the Conflict of Laws

The transferee is the one who receives the instrument by mail, by process server, or by warrant. The transferee is a target. The issuer is shooting the instrument at the target, hoping the target will just take the shot and agree to become liable on the new offer. The issuer is bluffing. If the transferee recognizes the demand instrument as a bluff, he can call the issuer on the bluff and require the issuer to pay. The transferee actually gains a security interest in the instrument if he recognizes it. If the instrument is issued and transferred for value (with implied consideration), the transferee acquires a security interest or other lien on the instrument if it was not obtained by judicial proceeding.

See UCC 3-303 below.

If you properly endorse an instrument issued and transferred for value, you acquire a right to enforce the instrument against the issuer. You become the creditor by returning it to the issuer, who becomes the debtor. By accepting the instrument (an offer) for value, you are altering the terms of the offer, and it becomes a counteroffer.

Acceptance If an acceptance modifies the terms or adds new ones, it generally operates as a counteroffer. Black’s 7th

The right to be the creditor is what you get when you A4V an instrument that is issued and transferred for value, like a tax bill, penal action “indictment,” or speeding Dishonor has value in ticket. These issues are all based on violations of statutes.

Violation of statutes has value in the public.

The violation of the statute is the presumed basis (consideration) for issuing the instrument, but if you have not promised to perform under those statutes, you are not obligated, and the issuer has no way of supporting his demand instrument. It is issued without consideration. It is issued based on a presumption that every U.S. citizen has pledged allegiance to the United States and to its private laws – statutes. It is a bluff. The river card has already been turned. You have the winning hand. You can call the issuer’s bluff. You can check. You can raise. You can fold. It is your choice. You have the button.

The commercial system of the United States is based on the Law Merchant. That law is not neutral; it is not set up to be fair. It is set up to facilitate collection for creditors, especially foreign creditors. It deals with debtors and creditors, even when there is no debtor/creditor relationship. The only thing that has to be determined in most situations is – who is the debtor and who is the creditor. Once that is determined, additional facts are usually irrelevant and immaterial. In the United States, every man is deemed to be a U.S. citizen, and every U.S. citizen is deemed to a debtor. A4V is one way of establishing that you are a creditor and not a debtor. If you are going to use the Law Merchant to settle disputes with the United States, a firm understanding of the Law Merchant is necessary. If you have commercial rights, the trier of facts in a commercial dispute will proceed cautiously to avoid denying you commercial due process.

Commercial due process is not much more than time and opportunity to complete an administrative remedy and produce a counterclaim. If you don’t know what your administrative remedies are, you probably don’t have any commercial rights to exercise. As one who represents a person in the United States, ie. a U.S. citizen, you have due process rights through the sovereign’s statutes. As a man in the several states, you have due process rights through your Creator’s natural order of things. Properly applied, commercial remedies incorporate the natural order of things. You can choose to use a sovereign’s statutes or commercial remedies, but they should not be used simultaneously. They are like oil and water. They do not mix. If you are going to use commercial remedies, injection of statutory rights will kill your commercial due process remedies. The terms of the offer and acceptance make the law that will be enforced.

Even though you might choose to use commercial remedies, you still need to use the person you represent in the public to access the commercial remedies. They have been statutized in State law. You can use them, but you cannot cite the source. The statutes use the natural order of things as the basis for their code sections, and then incorporate the private policy code sections into the same set of published statutes.

If you use the cite (UCC _ – _ _ _ or __ USC § _ _ _ _), you have reverted back to being a U.S. citizen taking a benefit from the statutes. If you demonstrate the principle in the code section without citing it, you maintain your separation. The person you represent in the public acquires the commercial rights, but you interject your rights through the natural order of things, and maintain your unalienable rights. You get to use the person, instead of it using you.

A person can acquire commercial rights through several means. According to the definition of “value” above, he can acquire them

a) in return for credit,
b) as security,
c) through a delivery pursuant to a contract, or
d) in return for any consideration.

Each of subsections (a) through (d) deals with a different scenario. The last one (d) is a general catchall that covers anything that might not have been addressed by the first three. This definition is one of the most confusing in the commercial code, and is one of the most important to understand.

A right is defined as a remedy. Debtors’ remedies often include defenses against foreclosure on the express or implied terms of an express or implied agreement for which security was given. Defenses are often given to debtors as consideration by creditors, and defenses are often given to creditors as consideration by debtors.

Money and things are not needed under this commercial system where interest in things like real estate, bank accounts, and bodies serve as consideration. For example, a creditor may sign an agreement giving possession of a product to a debtor before the debtor has paid for the product. In that case, the debtor has defenses if his creditor later accuses him of taking the product without paying for it. In the same transaction, the debtor may give defenses through the agreement to his creditor, if the debtor later claims the product he received was not what he ordered. The written agreement identifies what the debtor actually ordered.

The agreement will specify the terms of the agreement and the defenses each party gives to the other. Those defenses are rights that will result in a remedy if one of the parties is later wrongly accused of a breach. The people have commercial remedies if they are accused of a breach of some unknown contract. The accuser might claim a security interest in an antecedent claim against property supposedly pledged as security in exchange for value that was supposedly given by the accuser. That kind of claim would have to be issued for value, because the accuser would have no written agreement as the basis for his claim. His claim would be a new offer. He would be trying to get you to join in a new contract by implying that an antecedent contract existed. Since it does not exist, the issuer of the new offer has to be bluffing.

A4V is based on contract law.

If you think there is a presumption of a preexisting contract through which you are presumed to be a debtor that has supposedly pledged property and your liberty as security for some presumed value given by the United States, it might be very important for you to negotiate some better terms in a counteroffer. If the issuer of the instrument for value does not counter your counteroffer, you are in a much better position. If you have a record of a valid contract that contains terms in your favor and can be enforced in commerce, you have remedies. If you don’t, the United States may be entitled to enforce a different agreement. Even if you have an agreement advantageous to you, your actions may imply a waiver and your consent to abide by a less advantageous agreement.

Preexisting or antecedent claims can be created by agreement between the actual parties, but when the United States is a party, all agreements incorporate an attachment to the national debt – an antecedent claim other creditors have against the United States. It is like a program running in the background on your computer. The presumption that all U.S. citizens have pledged allegiance to the United States and its statutes, is enough to establish an antecedent claim in favor of the United States. U.S. citizens cannot question the national debt. They are called upon to be sureties for that debt, and they usually lose when a court proceeding is initiated against them for violation of statutes. This is done on the principle that the United States is more likely to pay its debt if it can collect from its debtors.

United States courts take jurisdiction of cases where a debtor to the United States is being charged with violation of United States statutes. Even though a U.S. citizen does not have a direct obligation to the creditors of the United States, through the  principle of novation, U.S. citizen generally agree to be liable without knowing they have done so. A person can transfer his rights and obligations to another party through agreement. A owes B. A or B can ask C to take on A’s obligation. If C agrees, and A and B are given notice that C has agreed to owe B what A owes B, the novation is complete, and A is relieved of the obligation of paying B. The U.S. citizen is C in this example. A is the United States, and B is the creditors of the United States.

The commercial code is first and foremost concerned about repayment of the national debt as a preexisting contract with an antecedent claim. The secondary function of the commercial code is to provide an orderly method of dealings between other debtors and creditors. United States Code (statutes) violations are claims used by creditors of the United States to collect internal revenue from U.S. citizens to pay the national debt. There can be claims stacked on claims. It is not uncommon for a totally discharged debt to be renewed by a creditor without the knowledge of the debtor. United States statutes are designed to transfer private rights from the private to the public for public use – to pay the national debt. Every evidence of debt in the United States has value. Persons in the United States carry on commercial transactions by giving and receiving value. Value has nothing to do with things, until there is a breach of an agreement, when an interest in a thing is transferred from the debtor to the creditor. On the private side, a thing is an object that casts a shadow. On the public side, only the shadow can be seen. On the public side, the shadow is given value. Interest in the thing is the value. It is not the thing.

——- Selected episodes/audio recordings from David Clarence:

EPISODE17 – Removing the Corrupt Official From Office 1, 2, 3 GONE! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, Tonight we will explain a simple lawful process that removes ANY Corrupt official from office, State, County, City, Town, Borough, Township or other corporate entities, such as Bankers, in three easy steps – 1, 2, 3 GONE! Get REAL COMMON SENSE Answers! BUT – You…

– – – – – –

EPISODE55 – USDOT registrant EXEMPT Status and More! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, Tonight, we will continue our previous Thursday evening Broadcasts, in our Town-Hall format. Tonight we discussed a few Patriot-For-Profit Scammer’s, Traitor’s and Knuckleheads…

Downloads: 265

EPISODE30 – Pledge to U.S. Battle flag is Loyalty Oath to Republic & YHVH! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, Tonight we explain that the Pledge of Allegiance, to the U.S. Battle flag, is actually a Pledge of Allegiance and Loyalty Oath, to the Republic Confederation united States of America and yahweh Almighty! Enjoy: a lighthearted atmosphere, where we exchange concer…

Downloads: 88

EPISODE74 – Who is this Dr. Sam Kennedy and Where Does All The Money GO? – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, Tonight I would like to discuss this character Dr. Sam Kennedy. And touch upon a few issues involving Pastor Tony King. And also this Commerce, UCC methodology issue in general…

Downloads: 179

EPISODE53 – notary’s return to broadcasting! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Evening Folks, The notary Broadcasts are Returning. The notary’s have decided to begin with an explanation of why we stopped broadcasting; what happened with the removal process; what we have been and are doing now; future plans and goals; and give everyone an opportunity to…

Downloads: 57

EPISODE72 – Pastor Tony King It’s “Put-up” or “Shut-up” Time! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, It is finally “Put-up” or “Shut-up” Time! We have invited Pastor Tony King, his supporter “Nana”; and these Commerce Guru’s, who know the details – Tom Schultz, Sam Davis, Winston Shrout, Tim Turner, Sam Kennedy and Kevin Hines; along with TRVTH who warned peopl…

Downloads: 217

EPISODE77 – Voice of Freedom _ Real Townhall Meeting Ask the notary! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, Last weeks Broadcast on the offices of man and woman, and their foundation in law, were well received – Thank you,,, Tonight, I am “not” planning a subject at this time…

Downloads: 53

EPISODE78 – notary’s splitting up! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, Although I don’t believe that this will be our last broadcast. It may be awhile, before we do another. It is with a heavy-heart that I must report that the notary’s have split-up…

Downloads: 56

Episode79_david_clarence_abducted_by_Pirates_inpersonating_FBI! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, It would appear that the announcement of our last episode, was prophetic, i.e.. “Although I don’t believe that this will be our last broadcast. It may be awhile, before we do another.” l will discuss on Saturday evenings broadcast, what took place during my Augu…

Downloads: 96

EPISODE85 – Tonight we will “re-visit” the office of man! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks; Tonight we will “re-visit” the office of man! It would appear that from the reports from listener’s and others that those who choose the path of commerce. Those commercial procedures, “CONTINUE” to fail in providing a remedy…

Downloads: 89

EPISODE87 – Every Relationship in Life, is a trust relationship! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks; Tonight we will “discuss” the principles and maximums of the trust relationships that the “office-of-man” is always operating in – a trust-relationship! Commercial procedures, continue to “FAIL” to provide a remedy…

Downloads: 132

EPISODE88 – Trust-law, office-of-man and trust currency. Who ownes what? – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks; Again tonight we will “discuss” the principles and maximums of the trust. The relationships that the “office-of-man” is always operating in – that can only be a trust-relationship! Commercial procedures, continue to “FAIL” to provide a remedy…

Downloads: 125

EPISODE89 – Is the office-of-man, using the correct seal on documents? – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks; Again tonight we will “discuss” the principles and maximums of the trust. The relationship that the “office-of-man” has to the trust and is always operating in. And in particular, are we using the correct seal on documents? Commercial procedures, continue to “FA…

Downloads: 95

EPISODE91 – The Road To Redemption vs the DTC Edifice! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks; Tonight we will discuss the “narrow” road to Redemption vs the “wide” road to such concepts as the DTC “Edifice”. And the relationship of those concepts to the “office-of-man”…

Downloads: 113

EPISODE81 – Commercial Remedies, are like Putting Out a Blaze with Fire? – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, I have changed the subject of this weeks broadcast. To cover what I see as a reoccurring error of folks looking to the UCC/Commerce Guru’s for a remedy from the commerce attack that they are experiencing…

Downloads: 70

EPISODE83 – Where Do The notary’s At York, Go From Here? – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, Since the “hillbilly” notary’s chose to pursue another path. And my most recent experience of having eighty-nine days of solitude, in which to think with a minimal amount of distraction…

Downloads: 42

EPISODE90 – The mathematical “algorithm” or “key” to the Master Account! 01-20-2010 – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may knowTalkShoeInc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks; Tonight we will discuss my updating the name’s “registrant” classification at the U.S. Department of Transportation, to the “new” Company Official! What that means and with “reservations” how that was accomplished…

Downloads: 658

EPISODE84 – “Regan Reedy, Patriot or Agent”? – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello Folks, When the “hill-Billy” notary’s decided to join the ranks of the notary’s at York. Bringing their individual life experience, knowledge and talents into our fold. We were called by Gerald frank, former-notary at county-edmond, Alberta nation Canada, as the “Dream…

Downloads: 75

notary_Message_to_RAP_Grand_Jury-0720-2010 – david clarence: Expressly Reserving All Liberties.

message from the notary-office at York county the land, nation Pennsylvania; to the Restore America Plan Grand Jury-office’s; regarding Tim Turner’s proposal that the RAP Grand Jury’s appoint him as interim-President of the United States of America; coving the office of Grand Juror, its duties and responsibilities according to the law. By: david clarence: Expressly Reserving All Liberties.

Downloads: 1,033

EPISODE92 – Regan Tom Tim an Agent Kennedy – What in Hell Are You Thinking? – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. This is not so much an attempt to expose. But more an Ode to a Very Dear Lady, Susan Reedy – Beware of Agent Dr. Sam “Glen Richard Unger” Kennedy! Hello Folks; Tonight and in my interest to protect a very dear lady, Susan [Regan Dwayne] Reedy, we will discuss the January 31,…

Downloads: 95

EPISODE93 – My Quest has ended – How yahweh The Almighty Led me to Victory! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello folks, Tonight we will discuss the more than thirty-eight year quest that I have prosecuted to obtain justice, and how yahweh The Almighty, led me to victory, over the Cannites…

Downloads: 133

EPISODE94 – Court Docket Numbers Being Converted To Legacy Account Numbers! Posted – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello folks, Tonight we will discuss how yahweh The Almighty, is lifting me up-out-of-bondage to the World BAR-Fly System. Through modifying all of the former BAR-Fly Court, Real Estate and Financial records, to “Legacy Account Records”…

Downloads: 129

A_Voice_of_Freedom_EPISODE97-Closing_Old_Bondage_Doors_so_New_Legacy_Doors_Can_Open – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

Hello folks, Tonight I would like to cover the events of the past six or eight weeks. And how past doors had to close, so that These New Doors Could Open. Possibly, timothy may show up and add his Special Perception, to this review. We will discuss the “reverse” greenback-silver side of the U.S. DOLLAR, and what additional discernment yahweh Father has given to timothy and I, on this subject. I believe that you will continue to be amazed, as we are…

Downloads: 150

A_Voice_of_Freedom_TS-330605_Episode96-Timothy_shows_why_Ustus_was_half-Wrong_and_tie_in_Peso-Dollar – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may know, TalkShoe, Inc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello folks, Tonight we will have the special delight of timothy, explaining why Eustus Mullens, was Half-WRONG about the FEDERAL RESERVE Note. thimothy, will tie that into the “Peso/US DOLLAR” issue, and explain in detail what is hidden behind the Wizard’s Curtain…

Downloads: 122

TS-328144_Episode95-Tony_King-His_Black-OPS_DTC_Pide-Piper_SCAM-Woe_Unto_Ye_Liar’s! – By: david clarence: All Liberties Expressly Reserved.

As you may knowTalkShoeInc. has obstructed the notary-office and grand-jury process. By de-authorizing the “A_Voice_of_Freedom” Broadcast and obstructing access to that forum and the archives of prior notary proceedings. Hello folks, Tonight we will discuss the so-called Pastor Tony King. His Black-OPS DTC/Pide-Piper SCAM, and the Commerce Guru’s who have signed on to this Road to Perdition RACKET…

Downloads: 110

– – – – – –

Christianity playlist. Illuminati playlist. The Gospel in the Stars Text and Video. ” Check out Marty Leeds.