Vengeancia (updated Nov. 2015) Here’s Part 2. First, check out A Brief Introduction To Sovereignty by Elias Alias, editor, Oathkeepers. Two years ago, I found an article over at My Private Audio. There’s no name on it, so I don’t have any idea who wrote it, originally. I apologize if you wrote it, and I’m not crediting it to you! Let’s credit it to “Anonymous.” I’m thinking it may be the work of activist and author, Eric WhoRU. Here’s a PDF. Check out activist Kurt Kallenbach; here.
I’m always having new insights, so read my recent articles, Burning the Beekeeper: The Benjamin David Gilmore Story, here; Free Speech on Trial: IRS Vs. Hendrickson, here; Free Dr. Dino! Never Forget 9/11, here.
The article, which I’ve rewritten for the most part, explains, that who “you” are, is no longer the question. The question is, who is “you.” Are we, the clueless American sheeple, just a bunch of blanks, waiting to be imprinted by swarming bureaucrats and attorneys casting the U.S. corporation script? Afterall, according to the most amazing actor, Robert De Niro, it’s the whole point of being a great actor! How will we “play” our roles?
Theoretically, according to the definition of Legal Personality, also here, you could have an entire army of criminals standing behind you in a courtroom. And you don’t even know it! You are the one being held liable for THEIR crimes! Who are “you?” Who are “they?” Check out the latest insights from Rod Class and the team at AIB Radio. Check out Thou, Thee, and Archaic Grammar, here. Generic “you.” Tricky indefinite pronouns. Also, read here and here.
“And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.” Mark 5:9. “
Seriously, What’s Up With All the You are a Slave Stuff? Read here. “A female forensic psychiatrist discovers that all of one of her patient’s multiple personalities are murder victims.” Check out the film, 6 Souls (2010) aka Shelter. Check out Technological Tools of the Beast and the False Prophet, here. Check out one of my favorite films, by James Mangold, Identity (2003).
“Words used in the singular include the plural and vice versa.” 15 USC Sect. 1127
“Prior to the transfer of an offender to the United States, the fact that the offender consents to such transfer and that such consent is voluntary and with full knowledge of the consequences thereof, shall be verified in the country in which the sentence was imposed by a United States magistrate judge, or by a citizen specifically designated by a judge of the United States…” 18 USC 4108; Power to Grant Writ, 2241. Read 3 Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent, here.
“Therefore, the U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an ‘individual entity.’” Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.
“A ‘US Citizen’ upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in ‘interstate commerce’, as a ‘resident’ does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914).
“From a town known as Wheeling, West Virginia Rode a boy with a six gun in his hand And his daring life of crime Made him a legend in his time East and west of the Rio Grande. Well he started with a bank in Colorado In the pocket of his vest, a Colt he hid And his age and his size Took the teller by surprise And, the word spread of Billy the kid…” Billy Joel’s song, Billy the Kid, video The song was featured in Dial Meg for Murder, here. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel, here.
Accept the Deed, here. Meet Your Strawman for background. Read this article about citizenship. Also read this info. about the Berth Certificate Registration. “Legal personality allows one or more natural persons to act as a single entity (a composite person) for legal purposes.” Read about a Republican form of government.
“It is fundamental in pleading that the facts be stated with reasonable definiteness and certainty to show the constituents of the pleaded cause of action and to apprise the adversary party of the case he is called upon to meet.” Grobart v. Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures, 2 N.J. 136, 65 A.2d 833 (1949) More here.
MONSTER: “Human Being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood and cannot be heir to any land.” Read more.
“From Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 1948 Edition. ‘Human Being’ is defined as follows: ‘See monster’. From the same dictionary, ‘monster’ is defined: ‘A human-being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal.’ Read here.
“A foreign national is person who is not a citizen of the United States and who is a citizen of a foreign country.” More. “…There is some documentary evidence to support the notion that parties who are in fact at war with each other may not refer formally to each other by their Proper Names; instead a “nom de guerre” is a customary legal requirement under the Law of Nations.” Read more.
Are Americans at war with our so-called “government?” The reverse side of a Pennsylvania Berth Certificate says the Registrant is a “subject” of the Commonwealth! Is it the “subject matter?” Has the corporation dba the United States mortgaged the “land of our soul” via the Birth Certificate registration? Is it the “afterbirth?” Is the “natural person,” in fact, the “afterbirth?” Check out 46 USC Section 2101, General Definitions. Check out Section 2106, Liability in Rem.
- § 1-102 “District created body corporate for municipal purposes.” Read more here.
- Read about the District of Columbia Organic Act, 1871
- Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A: ” ‘United States’ means a federal corporation.”
- CRS 4-9-307 (h): “The United States is located in the District of Columbia.”
Imagine that a real man or woman is born on the land with a bag of gold next to him or her, representing his or her rights. Now imagine that the corporate State separates that bag of gold from the baby at birth and conveys this “property”- the child’s rightful inheritance – into an “e-state,” a vessel, an instrument, a franchise – to be administered secretly by an “e-squire”, or attorney. Read more.
Check out this from Mike Hoggard, Rewriting the Book, video. The public trustees (for USA, the country) hold this property in trust for the child. In the meantime, they allow a private corporation (U.S. = Uncle Sam) to monetize (securitize) the property and trade it for profit! For the alleged child’s benefit, of course. Now imagine that the Crown (via BAR certified attorneys) administers this property for the benefit of the Queen of England! Or the Committee of 300. Or some other Elite group! Does it matter who “they” are? Stop consenting!
“In rem is a Latin term meaning “against or about a thing”. An in rem proceeding refers to a lawsuit or other legal action directed toward property, rather than toward a particular person.” Read more.
Read about Fief. Read about Trover, Converson, Trespass, etc. here. Read about Reconveyance: “The transfer of real property that takes place when a mortgage is fully paid off and the land is returned to the owner free from the former debt.” What is an Action to Quiet Title?
“Queen Pasiphae slept with a bull sent by Zeus, and gave birth to Minotaur, a creature half man – half bull. King Minos was embarrassed, but did not want to kill the Minotaur, so he hid the monster in the Labyrinth constructed by Daedalus at the Minoan Palace of Knossos.” Read more.
“Only puny secrets need protection. Big discoveries are protected by public incredulity.” Marshall McLuhan
You might want to read The Public Private Distinction in the Conflict of Laws by William S. Dodge PDF. Check out US antitrust law and coercive monopoly here. What do you know about Thomas Paine? Check out Private-Person. Here’s Rob Ryder’s page. Here is Robb Ryder’s site. Watch this video from Rod Class re: the Cestui Que Trust. Check out 26 USC Section 862 – Income From Sources Without the United States here. Listen to Redress Right chat about it.
Listen to this MP3 from David Clarence. Download this PDF, The Work of the Alien Property Custodian by Paul V. Myron. Check out United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990) here. “The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.” Read more from FamGuardian and Tami Pepperman.
Common law is generally uncodified; Civil Law, in contrast, is codified. Read more. You may want to take a look at Jurisprudence: Or the Theory of the Law here; essays from Fort Fairfield Journal Editor David Deschesne PDFand American Citizen or U.S. citizen PDF. Check out this playlist. Check out our Featured Activist, 4409. Watch this playlist. What is a Sovereign Citizen? 1954 UN Convention on Stateless Persons PDF. Do Illegal Aliens Have Constitutional Rights? Read it here.
“Money; In usual and ordinary acceptation it means coins and paper currency used as circulating medium of exchange, and does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt, or other personal or real estate. Lane v. Railey, 280 Ky. 319, 133 S. W.2d 74, 79, 81.” Read more at Supreme Law Library. Read The Rape of We, the People and the Constitution for the united States here. EVIDENCE, PROCEDURE, AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT at Social Security website.
“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” Senate Document No. 43, 73D Congress, 1st Session, entitled: “Contracts Payable in Gold”, by George Cyrus Thorpe, submitted to the senate: April 17, 1933“
. . . nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. ” Amendment V
How can a free people reconcile these two apparently contradictory statements? If” all property” is “in the state,” then what private property rights remain with we, the real men and women? Whatever happened to the 14th amendment’s prohibition against involuntary servitude? This article will explore these questions. Also read, A Dictatorship Without Tears, here.
Do a search on Collective Entity. Folks typically say “The people are outside” not “The people is outside.” In America, We, the People are the sovereigns, meaning that each man and/or woman, individually, is a sovereign with unalienable rights. Yet “people” is a collective noun. Therefore, around Musicians 4 Freedom, “we,” (meaning yours truly and anyone who agrees with me) are in the habit of referring to a singular man or woman acting in his or her sovereign capacity as a FOTL, Freeman on the Land aka a “people,” rather than as a PERSON, or a Person, etc. which are legal fictions and can mean either an “individual” or a collective.
Of course, as we shall see, the “individual,” is really a collective, too!. Believe it or not, all of the NWO legalese is trickery! Even the terms that we think are being used in the singular actually indicate a combination of the real man with=con the state, a commerce=fornication spoken of by the prophet, Daniel 2:43.
Ambiguous US Code
The US Code is intentionally ambiguous; and as we know, an ambiguous contract is construed AGAINST the drafter. Question: If the US Code does not differentiate between singular and plural, how can a singular man or woman refer to himself or herself relative to, and standing under, the US Code?
Person: one (as a human being, a partnership, or a corporation) that is recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties. Merriam Webster
“Ambiguity in a contract happens when there is a term, or set of terms, that are not defined, that can be construed to have more than one meaning (hence the ambiguity in the contract). When this happens, the ambiguity is construed against the drafter of the contract since it was the party that drafted the contract.” Read more.
“I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.” Psalm 40:8
Answer: stop consenting to participate in, and to be accessory to, the ambiguous and illegal behaviors of the so-called government! How? By writing our own express contracts with definite terms, and making these available to our so-called public officials. Put your documents on record (18 USC § 1512 ) at your local Clerk and Recorders office. Give the so-called officials 21 days to respond and/or object. When they don’t, they have consented to your terms.
The Contract Clause appears in the United States Constitution, Article I, section 10, clause 1. It states: “No State shall…pass any… Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts….”
“All human beings are persons, but not all persons are human beings. A human being is not just a skeleton of bones and flesh; he is much more than that. It is human body that is composed of flesh, blood and bones. Human soul is composed of human spirit. A human being is a psychosomatic entity that is a union of human flesh and human spirit. It is when we refer to this human flesh that we talk of persons.” Difference between Person and Human here.
IRC 7701(a)(1) does not refer to “person” in the usual sense of a living human being. Rather, Reg. 301.7701-1(a) instructs that the term “person” includes an individual, corporation, partnership, trust or estate, joint-stock company, association, syndicate, group, pool, joint venture or other unincorporated organization or group, guardian, committee, trustee, executor, administrator, trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, assignee for the benefit of creditors, conservator, or any person acting in a fiduciary capacity.
ALIENATE, aliene, alien. This is a generic term applicable to the various methods of transferring property from one person to another. Lord Coke, says, (1 Inst. 118 b,) alien cometh of the verb alienate, that is, alienum facere vel ex nostro dominio in alienum trawferre sive rem aliquam in dominium alterius transferre. These methods vary, according to the nature of the property to be conveyed and the particular objects the conveyance is designed to accomplish. It has been held, that under a prohibition to alienate, long leases are comprehended. 2 Dow’s Rep. 210.
Notice that the IRC list does not include beneficiary. It doesn’t include Assignor or Guarantor. For example, let’s say a seller alienates property by transferring to a buyer a parcel of the seller’s land containing a house, in exchange for cash. The seller is said to have alienated her rights in that parcel, such as the right to modify or even demolish the house on the parcel of land, to the buyer.
Those rights now belong to the buyer. Is it possible that we, the people, ALIENATE our rights to the property of our own God-created bodies, the land of our soul, by our own consent, when we put our footprints on a Birth Certificate? The UCC calls this an unconscionable contract. Wouldn’t it be our obligation to revoke such an arrangement, once we become aware of it?
“An estoppel certificate is typically used when the owner of a commercial property wants to sell or refinance the property, and the buyer or lender requires confirmation of the status of all leases in the property, to ensure that the tenant(s) do not have any claims against the landlord which would allow the tenants to offset or withhold future rent payments.” Read more.
“An estoppel certificate is a written declaration signed by a party who attests, for the benefit of another party, to the accuracy of certain facts described in the declaration. The estoppel certificate prevents the party who signs it from later challenging the validity of those facts. This type of document is perhaps most common in the context of mortgages, or home loans. If one bank seeks to purchase mortgages owned by another bank, the purchasing bank may request the borrowers, or homeowners, to sign an estoppel certificate establishing (1) that the mortgage is valid, (2) the amount of principal and interest due as of the date of the certificate, and (3) that no defenses exist that would affect the value of the mortgage. After signing this certificate, the borrower cannot dispute those facts.” Read more.
“That the seizing, or attempting to seize, any person in America, in order to transport such person beyond the sea, for trial of offenses, committed within the body of a county in America, being against law, will justify, and ought to meet with resistance and reprisal…” First Continental Congress on October 21, 1774. Are we all, like Jimmy Buffet observes, the “son of a son of a sailor?” Are Americans being transported “beyond the sea” virtually?
Public Salvageable Property
The purpose of “public” schooling is to train our little boys and girls, our families and children, to be the public salvageable property of the Elite, small slithery animals stuffed into the cargo hold of the Artificial PERSON…. Bantha Fodder. The “criminal” justice system is run by criminals! The attorneys are bounty hunters. Now I get it! Suddenly it all makes sense! Unfortunately, the joke’s on us! We are the innocent agents of unknown principals. Check out this latest Billy Corgan interview. Check out this Sovereignty playlist.
“A person may not be prosecuted as an accomplice in the commission of a crime if he is a member of the class of persons for whom the statute prohibiting the conduct was enacted to protect.” Legislative Exemption Rule
“I am currently active in the Shriners and the Jesters. I am ashamed of what I have become and what the Shriners have become.” Read more at Freemasonry Watch. The Legal Person: The Jewish Talmudic Definition, PDF.
Manley P. Hall observed, “Freemasonry is a fraternity within a fraternity.” Hmmm… kind of like the United States, the corporation, is “within” the United States, the country? Kind of like a Municipal Corporation has a dual character, public and private? Check out Codex Magica from our featured activist Texe Marrs. “…That’s what I am, Please understand, I wanna be your holy man.” Steeley Dan. Read about The Fez.
Check out this article at Daily Paul. And this one. By the way, you can listen to court cases related to equal protection for aliens, citizens, etc. being argued at this site, OYEZ. Check out this case, Bernal v. Fainter.
“It should not be forgotten that a public office is a public trust….” Read about it here. Check out this comprehensive list of cases. Tami Pepperman docs. Check out Jersey City v. Hague. Check out Revolution Radio here and vids, Revolution Radio.
“The Indiana court has repeatedly stated that municipal corporations are not liable for negligence in discharging governmental functions, but are liable for negligence in the exercise of their private, proprietary functions.” Check out Tort Liability of Municipal Corporations in Indiana PDF.
Person Can be a Verb (Role) or a Noun (Thing)
So, a “person” can be a verb, i.e., a role one might perform; and it can be a noun, i.e., a thing relative to which the role is performed. A “person” can mean a singular entity, or it can mean a collective entity. Be sure to read all of the articles from Paul Andrew Mitchell. He made this graphic, below. He maintains that a NonResident Alien is the only legal status that is not regulated by the IRS and other alphabet gangs.
I use the words, “man” and “woman” to reference a singular sovereign man or woman, a singular “people.” It seems to me that there is a lot of confusion around the internet re: the “person.” Check out this blurb:
“First, what is a ‘person’? There are legally two kinds of ‘persons’. First there is the ‘natural person’ with inalienable rights. This is a flesh and blood human being, the sovereign individual. Second, there is just the term ‘person’. When just the term ‘person’ is used, and not ‘natural person’, it means an artificial person, such as a corporation, trust, government, etc. A human being can be both a natural person and an artificial person at the same time. How do you tell the difference? It is as simple as whether you spell your name in all capital letters or not. More on this in a bit. The important thing to remember at this point is that artificial persons are property.” Read more.
I would have to disagree with this author that the “natural person” is a “flesh and blood being” with “inalienable rights.” Only the real man or woman has any real rights; any type of legally-defined “entity” including a ROLE, has mere privileges granted to it by whatever other entity is defining it. What we’re looking for here is UN-alienable rights, meaning physically incapable of being alienated.
For example, let’s consider the case of a woman who works as a nurse. When she’s home, relaxing with her family, no one expects her to draw blood and change bedpans. But when she goes to the hospital where she has consented to work part time, and puts on her uniform, she has consented to a set of contractual arrangements, which probably include following hospital rules regarding hand washing, needle disposal, etc.
There are four concepts going on in any legal system: a place, an actor, a role, and a performance. 1.) There’s a place/venue, i.e., a hospital. 2.) There’s an actor, a “token,” or generic “person.” 3.) There’s a role/status i.e., a nurse, which is characterized by a job description. 4.) There’s a performance. Part of the nurse’s contract says she needs to serve her clients, the patients.
The real man or woman comprises a fifth concept, as she/he stands outside, with a private identity. The real man or woman is not always acting and/or willing to act!
“The Constitution was a compact drawn between the people and effective between the states. It created a union of States, not a union of people…..The function of Congress is to make our laws, to the extent that the Constitution permits law making, and to make the laws for the municipal government….States, individuals and companies have all surrendered rights in exchange for Federal Reserve notes (fiat money) by entering into invisible contracts with the federal government. They do so by the use of such things as bank accounts, Social Security accounts, credit cards, etc. These invisible contracts have given the Federal Government jurisdiction over the majority of Americans, tried in Federal Equity/Admiralty Courts where the Constitution has no standing, as you have a contract with the government, and you never even knew it.” Melvin Stamper, Fruit From a Poisonous Tree. More.
A citizenship ought to be a part-time job, by contract. We, the PRIVATE men and women create that contract. As Patrick Henry observed, the purpose of that contract is to control the government, those elected by the people, not to control the people. The people are not required to stand under the US Code! Our challenge is to individualize our generic one-size-fits-all contract. Think of your relationship to the corporation dba the United States like a software company – Apple, for example. While you agree to the terms of using the software, in general, you demand that the company provides plenty of negotiable and modifiable features. You are always in control.
“In order for an actus reus to be committed there has to have been an act. Various common law jurisdictions define act differently but generally, an act is a ‘bodily movement whether voluntary or involuntary.’ “
So, you can’t get in trouble for BEING a real man or a real woman. But you can get in trouble for BEING an entity that the elite claim to control and for DOING something they have prohibited that entity to do. Like being a “defendent,” for example. What does that mean? Are you sure you want to agree to BE one? Perhaps it carries contractual strings!
Let’s say you are an orderly and you usually change bedpans and change linen. One day you wander into the operating room by mistake and pick up a knife and start cutting into somebody! That could be a disaster! Unfortunately, the PTB trick us into accepting a role that comes with criminal liability. Read more.
In America, under our constitutional republican form of government, the people exercise our citizenship by our consent. When we perform any aspect of our “citizenship job” like voting or paying taxes, we have agreed to follow rules set down in the Constitution for governing the united States of America, which also apply to the corporation dba the United States. We retain rights, and we also delegate rights. Rights we delegate are returned to our citizenship(s) as exemptions, privileges, and benefits. Be sure to check out USA VS US.
Real men and women, who are infinitely complex, are continuous and undefinable, like division by zero! For this article, I’ve adopted the following protocol: “PERSON” to refer to an artificial legal person (organization); and “Person” to refer to a natural person (individual), which is still an “entity” and a legal fiction.
Aliens, Nationals, Citizens
NRA is an acronym for Nonresident Alien. What is the difference between a Foreign National and a Nonresident Alien? Here’s what this “Human Resources” blurb has to say:
“A Foreign National – is a term used to describe a person who is not a citizen of the host country in which he or she is temporally residing. An individual who is a citizen of any country other than the US. Whether a foreign national is a nonresident or resident alien for tax purposes is determined based on the individual’s visa status, purpose of the current visit, length of stay in the US.A Nonresident Alien
(NRA) – is any person who is not a US Citizen, not a lawful permanent resident (green card holder) and does not meet either the Green Card or the Substantial Presence Test. A nonresident alien files a special tax form, pays tax only on US source income, is subject to special rates, and may qualify for treaty exemptions.” More.
Read the definitions at 8 USC. It would appear that a “Foreign National” is roughly equivalent to a “Sovereign Citizen,” aka an “American Citizen.” A “Foreign National” is a temporary resident of the U.S. Remember, citizen=individual=person are all legal fictions. Those dreaded adhesion contracts are made between the Natural Person, John Doe Smith, and the Artificial Person, JOHN DOE SMITH, which is a “franchise” of the United States, wholly owned by it, kind of like a McDonald’s Restaurant. The legal system can only deal with real people “appearing” in a recognizable ROLE relative to their franchise, whether customer or burger flipper. So, the question is, what ROLES are there, and what ROLE do you want to play relative to the franchise they gave you?
“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
Hmmmm….a special class of citizen? Maybe like a ROBOT? Like a DRONE? Maybe like a Secret Agent Man? Maybe his role is CLASSIFIED, even? Maybe it would be against national security to tell you what his job is, really? Maybe, like Jason Bourne, he doesn’t even know what his job is?
- The Reign of the Heavens Society, here.
- Divine Provice, James McBride, Reading Room, here.
- The General Post Office for the United States of America, here.
“An offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.” from Restatement 2nd of Contracts here. “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.” 28 USC Section 1350. Check out Foreseeable Zone of Risk: Confusing Foreseeability with Dutyhere.
The Person is still defined as an Estate of a Decedent, the PERSON, registered in a foreign jurisdiction, regardless of how you write its name. “You” can, and more importantly you do, make joinder with the PERSON’s Estate, regardless of how its name is written, simply when, and by answering to the judge when he or she addresses, “you”. Inasmuch as I am me, who is “you”? Here’s the original PDF
Check out Humanity Transcending. Police officers filing false reports, here and here. Check out Revolution Radio. Check out Order of Merchants. Oh, and don’t miss great songs and music from Mark DeAngelis!
Check out The Takings Clause, by Alex Bansak Inspired by “Wonderwall” performed by Oasis; This is a “Law Lessong” – a law lesson in a song – that was written by a student in a Legal Environment of Business Class at the University of Connecticut. I use it in class to help students contemplate the parameters of the doctrine of Eminent Domain. Featured in the video is the performance of student and lyricist Alex Bansak who submitted this video for use in class.
More “Law Lessong” videos are posted at the Legal Studies Classroom blog: http://legalstudiesclassroom.blogspot…
No copyright infringement is intended. This song is offered and intended for educational use only and has no commercial value.
Nominal: “of, relating to, constituting, bearing, or giving a name.” — “Of, relating to, or being the amount or face value of a sum of money or a stock certificate….” Face value “…the stated value of an investment at maturity …Life insurance policies, bank notes, currency, some shares, and other securities have face values.” Hmmm…kind of like Facebook? Notice the statue of Theseus slaying the Minotaur in this Moody Blues video, Knights in White Satin.
“Get up in the morning, slaving for bread, sir, So that every mouth can be fed. Poor me, the Israelites, sir.” Israelites song by Desmond Dekker and Leslie Kong. “You have sold yourselves for nothing, And you shall be redeemed without money.” Isaiah 52
Remember Secret Agent Man? “There’s a man who leads a life of danger, To everyone he meets he stays a stranger. With every move he makes, another chance he takes. Odds are he won’t live to see tomorrow. Secret agent man, secret agent man. They’ve given you a number and taken away your name.” Steve Barri and P. F. Sloan.
Agency Law: “Delegating your legal authority is called “agency”. A principal gives her authority (rights) to an agent.” Also, “Acquiescence in the acts of an agent, or one who has assumed that character, will be equivalent to an express authority.” Read more.“It is relatively common for commercial agents to act for multiple principals, some of whom may be competing.” Read more. What is an Executor De Son Tort?
Check out United States v. Doe – 465 U.S. 605 (1984) here. Check out Fisher v. United States – 425 U.S. 391 (1976) here. Check out Williams v. United States – 289 U.S. 553 (1933) here. Check out “You’re Not a “citizen” Under the Internal Revenue Code” here. Continued here.